Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27798036›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature.

Veronica Ranieri, Helen Barratt, Naomi Fulop, Geraint Rees

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Supporting early-career dementia researchers: Identifying support needs and ways forward via a European study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronica RanieriAcademic Careers Office, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Helen BarrattDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Naomi FulopHealth Care Organisation and Management, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Geraint ReesFaculty of Life Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe future of academic medicine is uncertain. Concerns regarding the future availability of qualified and willing trainee clinical academics have been raised worldwide. Of significant concern is our failure to retain postdoctoral trainee clinical academics, who are likely to be our next generation of leaders in scientific discovery.

objectivesTo review the literature about factors that may influence postdoctoral career progression in early career clinical academics.

designThis study employed a scoping review method. Three reviewers separately assessed whether the articles found fit the inclusion criteria. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (1991-2015). ARTICLE SELECTION: The review encompassed a broad search of English language studies published anytime up to November 2015. All articles were eligible for inclusion, including research papers employing either quantitative or qualitative methods, as well as editorials and other summary articles. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted from included publications were charted according to author(s), sample population, study design, key findings, country of origin and year of publication.

resultsOur review identified 6 key influences: intrinsic motivation, work-life balance, inclusiveness, work environment, mentorship and availability of funding. It also detected significant gaps within the literature about these influences.

conclusionsThree key steps are proposed to help support postdoctoral trainee clinical academics. These focus on ensuring that researchers feel encouraged in their workplace, involved in collaborative dialogue with key stakeholders and able to access reliable information regarding their chosen career pathway. Finally, we highlight recommendations for future research.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMotivationResearch PersonnelEducation, MedicalHumansClinical Academic CareersEarly Career Clinical Academic ProgressionEarly Career Clinical AcademicsMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Identifiers

PMID27798036
PMCPMC5093673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.