ArticleBMJ open2016
Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mentoring as an intervention to promote gender equality in academic medicine: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Connecting the Dots: Exploring the Association between Perceived Discrimination and Physical and Psychological Well-Being Among Doctoral Trainees and Postdoctoral Fellows in Biomedical Fields.Journal of diversity in higher education · 2026Article
- How do Internal Medicine Residents from Different Backgrounds Make Subspecialty Career Choices? A Qualitative Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Fostering international mentorship and collaborations: evaluation of the Global Bridges program for early-career researchers in health care sciences.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Students' and educators' perceptions of clinical academic pathways in the UK: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Exploring the motivation of health professionals to engage with research at various career stages.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Supporting early-career dementia researchers: Identifying support needs and ways forward via a European study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Article
- Meeting the Shared Goals of a Student-Selected Component: Pilot Evaluation of a Collaborative Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Qualitative evaluation of postdoctoral trainee and faculty advisor experiences within a research-intensive school of pharmacy.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Article
- Tips to Support the Recruitment, Retention, and Progression of Clinical Academics.Medical science educator · 2022Article
- Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Effective Veterinary Clinical Teaching in a Variety of Teaching Settings.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- Evidence-based approaches for promoting gender equity in global mental health research: Study protocol for social network analysis of researchers in Nepal.SSM. Mental health · 2021Article
- A qualitative study exploring experiences and challenges of combining clinical academic training with family life.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe future of academic medicine is uncertain. Concerns regarding the future availability of qualified and willing trainee clinical academics have been raised worldwide. Of significant concern is our failure to retain postdoctoral trainee clinical academics, who are likely to be our next generation of leaders in scientific discovery.
objectivesTo review the literature about factors that may influence postdoctoral career progression in early career clinical academics.
designThis study employed a scoping review method. Three reviewers separately assessed whether the articles found fit the inclusion criteria. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (1991-2015). ARTICLE SELECTION: The review encompassed a broad search of English language studies published anytime up to November 2015. All articles were eligible for inclusion, including research papers employing either quantitative or qualitative methods, as well as editorials and other summary articles. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted from included publications were charted according to author(s), sample population, study design, key findings, country of origin and year of publication.
resultsOur review identified 6 key influences: intrinsic motivation, work-life balance, inclusiveness, work environment, mentorship and availability of funding. It also detected significant gaps within the literature about these influences.
conclusionsThree key steps are proposed to help support postdoctoral trainee clinical academics. These focus on ensuring that researchers feel encouraged in their workplace, involved in collaborative dialogue with key stakeholders and able to access reliable information regarding their chosen career pathway. Finally, we highlight recommendations for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.