Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797828›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2016

Hybrid Scheme for Modeling Local Field Potentials from Point-Neuron Networks.

Espen Hagen, David Dahmen, Maria L Stavrinou, Henrik Lindén, Tom Tetzlaff, Sacha J van Albada, Sonja Grün, Markus Diesmann, Gaute T Einevoll

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Python toolbox for neural circuit parameter inference.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neurobiological Causal Models of Language Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Espen HagenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
David DahmenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Maria L StavrinouDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 Ås, Norway.
Henrik LindénDepartment of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tom TetzlaffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Sacha J van AlbadaInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Sonja GrünInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Markus DiesmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6) and JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Gaute T EinevollDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 Ås, Norway.
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DENorwegian University of Life Sciences · NORWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With rapidly advancing multi-electrode recording technology, the local field potential (LFP) has again become a popular measure of neuronal activity in both research and clinical applications. Proper understanding of the LFP requires detailed mathematical modeling incorporating the anatomical and electrophysiological features of neurons near the recording electrode, as well as synaptic inputs from the entire network. Here we propose a hybrid modeling scheme combining efficient point-neuron network models with biophysical principles underlying LFP generation by real neurons. The LFP predictions rely on populations of network-equivalent multicompartment neuron models with layer-specific synaptic connectivity, can be used with an arbitrary number of point-neuron network populations, and allows for a full separation of simulated network dynamics and LFPs. We apply the scheme to a full-scale cortical network model for a ∼1 mm

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsCerebral CortexComputer SimulationHumansMembrane PotentialsNeural InhibitionNeuronsThalamuscortical microcircuitelectrostatic forward modelingextracellular potentialmulticompartment neuron modelingpoint-neuron network models

Identifiers

PMID27797828
PMCPMC6193674
OpenAlexW2535290152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.