Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797797›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2016

Infrarenal aortic clamp reviving a patient from acute surgical haemorrhagic shock: a novel management technique.

Ranjith Kumar, M V S Satya Prakash, Subhasree Das, Ramanitharan Manikandan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ranjith KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education, Puducherry, India.
M V S Satya PrakashDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education, Puducherry, India.
Subhasree DasDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education, Puducherry, India.
Ramanitharan ManikandanDepartment of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) is almost always accompanied by massive intraoperative blood loss and associated complications. It is a widely recognised problem, and its active management is essential in improving the perioperative morbidity and mortality. We share our experience with a similar case of open radical nephrectomy with massive blood loss of twice the circulating volume in a duration of <8 surgical hours. Although we emphasise the goals of securing haemostasis, restoration of circulating volume, and efficient management by replacing blood components, in the present case, despite the above-mentioned goals being fulfilled, we were unable to extricate the patient from haemorrhagic shock by conventional means and therefore resorted to desperate measures, namely the novel approach of infrarenal aortic clamping along with higher than recommended vasopressor support. We resorted to this in order to maintain the haemodynamic parameters and to prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality related to persistent intraoperative hypotension. With such an approach, we successfully managed the patient perioperatively, ultimately resulting in the patient being discharged after a week of intensive care unit stay without major complications.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAorta, AbdominalBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionCarcinoma, Renal CellConstrictionHumansKidney NeoplasmsMalePostoperative ComplicationsShock, Hemorrhagic

Identifiers

PMID27797797
PMCPMC5073668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.