Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797787›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial.

TRUST Investigators writing group, Jason W Busse, Mohit Bhandari, Thomas A Einhorn, Emil Schemitsch, James D Heckman, Paul Tornetta, Kwok-Sui Leung, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Sun Makosso-Kallyth and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00667849 (Trial to Evaluate UltraSound in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00667849 naterminatednot on this map

Trial to Evaluate UltraSound in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorBioventus LLCRan2008 to 2012Enrolled501ConditionsTibial FracturesArmsExogen 4000+, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  17. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Technology behind augmenting fracture healing.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

TRUST Investigators writing group
Jason W BusseDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada bussejw@mcmaster.ca.
Mohit BhandariDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Thomas A EinhornDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Emil SchemitschDepartment of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada.
James D HeckmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
Paul TornettaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Kwok-Sui LeungDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Diane Heels-AnsdellDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Sun Makosso-KallythDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Gregory J Della RoccaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
Clifford B JonesCenter for Orthopedic Research and Education, CORE, Banner University, Phoenix, AZ, 85023, USA.
Gordon H GuyattDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
McMaster University · CANYU Langone Health · USBanner Health · USChinese University of Hong Kong · CNDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), compared with sham treatment, accelerates functional recovery and radiographic healing in patients with operatively managed tibial fractures.

designA concealed, randomized, blinded, sham controlled clinical trial with a parallel group design of 501 patients, enrolled between October 2008 and September 2012, and followed for one year.

setting43 North American academic trauma centers.

participantsSkeletally mature men or women with an open or closed tibial fracture amenable to intramedullary nail fixation. Exclusions comprised pilon fractures, tibial shaft fractures that extended into the joint and required reduction, pathological fractures, bilateral tibial fractures, segmental fractures, spiral fractures >7.5 cm in length, concomitant injuries that were likely to impair function for at least as long as the patient's tibial fracture, and tibial fractures that showed <25% cortical contact and >1 cm gap after surgical fixation. 3105 consecutive patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for tibial fracture were assessed, 599 were eligible and 501 provided informed consent and were enrolled.

interventionsPatients were allocated centrally to self administer daily LIPUS (n=250) or use a sham device (n=251) until their tibial fracture showed radiographic healing or until one year after intramedullary fixation.

main outcome measuresPrimary registry specified outcome was time to radiographic healing within one year of fixation; secondary outcome was rate of non-union. Additional protocol specified outcomes included short form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores, return to work, return to household activities, return to ≥80% of function before injury, return to leisure activities, time to full weight bearing, scores on the health utilities index (mark 3), and adverse events related to the device.

resultsSF-36 PCS data were acquired from 481/501 (96%) patients, for whom we had 2303/2886 (80%) observations, and radiographic healing data were acquired from 482/501 (96%) patients, of whom 82 were censored. Results showed no impact on SF-36 PCS scores between LIPUS and control groups (mean difference 0.55, 95% confidence interval -0.75 to 1.84; P=0.41) or for the interaction between time and treatment (P=0.30); minimal important difference is 3-5 points) or in other functional measures. There was also no difference in time to radiographic healing (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.34; P=0.55). There were no differences in safety outcomes between treatment groups. Patient compliance was moderate; 73% of patients administered ≥50% of all recommended treatments.

conclusionsPostoperative use of LIPUS after tibial fracture fixation does not accelerate radiographic healing and fails to improve functional recovery.Study registration ClinicalTrialGov Identifier: NCT00667849.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodTibial FracturesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonic Waves

Identifiers

PMID27797787
PMCPMC5080447
OpenAlexW2545197868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.