Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797775›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning.

Toby Dylan Hocking, Patricia Goerner-Potvin, Andreanne Morin, Xiaojian Shao, Tomi Pastinen, Guillaume Bourque

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Benchmarking peak calling methods for CUT&RUN.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Unsupervised Contrastive Peak Caller for ATAC-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toby Dylan HockingDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, H3A-1A4, Montréal, Canada.
Patricia Goerner-PotvinDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, H3A-1A4, Montréal, Canada.
Andreanne MorinDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, H3A-1A4, Montréal, Canada.
Xiaojian ShaoDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, H3A-1A4, Montréal, Canada.
Tomi PastinenDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, H3A-1A4, Montréal, Canada.
Guillaume BourqueDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, H3A-1A4, Montréal, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

CIHR EP1-120608CIHR EP1-120609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Many peak detection algorithms have been proposed for ChIP-seq data analysis, but it is not obvious which algorithm and what parameters are optimal for any given dataset. In contrast, regions with and without obvious peaks can be easily labeled by visual inspection of aligned read counts in a genome browser. We propose a supervised machine learning approach for ChIP-seq data analysis, using labels that encode qualitative judgments about which genomic regions contain or do not contain peaks. The main idea is to manually label a small subset of the genome, and then learn a model that makes consistent peak predictions on the rest of the genome. Results: We created 7 new histone mark datasets with 12 826 visually determined labels, and analyzed 3 existing transcription factor datasets. We observed that default peak detection parameters yield high false positive rates, which can be reduced by learning parameters using a relatively small training set of labeled data from the same experiment type. We also observed that labels from different people are highly consistent. Overall, these data indicate that our supervised labeling method is useful for quantitatively training and testing peak detection algorithms. Availability and Implementation: Labeled histone mark data http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~thocking/chip-seq-chunk-db/ , R package to compute the label error of predicted peaks https://github.com/tdhock/PeakError. Contacts: toby.hocking@mail.mcgill.ca or guil.bourque@mcgill.ca. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareSupervised Machine LearningAnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID27797775
PMCPMC5408812
OpenAlexW2538873949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.