ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Genome-Wide IGF-1R Recruitment to Enhancer and Promoter Regions of Chromatin in Clinical Prostate Cancers.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Benchmarking peak calling methods for CUT&RUN.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Unsupervised contrastive peak caller for ATAC-seq.Genome research · 2023Article
- Unsupervised Contrastive Peak Caller for ATAC-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Epidemic changepoint detection in the presence of nuisance changes.Statistical papers (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- Efficient detection and classification of epigenomic changes under multiple conditions.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Semi-supervised peak calling with SPAN and JBR genome browser.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Increased peak detection accuracy in over-dispersed ChIP-seq data with supervised segmentation models.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Multi Locus View: an extensible web-based tool for the analysis of genomic data.Communications biology · 2021Article
- ChIP-BIT2: a software tool to detect weak binding events using a Bayesian integration approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Enhanced epigenetic profiling of classical human monocytes reveals a specific signature of healthy aging in the DNA methylome.Nature aging · 2021Article
- CNN-Peaks: ChIP-Seq peak detection pipeline using convolutional neural networks that imitate human visual inspection.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- SeqAcademy: an educational pipeline for RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq analysis.F1000Research · 2018Article
- SigSeeker: a peak-calling ensemble approach for constructing epigenetic signatures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Many peak detection algorithms have been proposed for ChIP-seq data analysis, but it is not obvious which algorithm and what parameters are optimal for any given dataset. In contrast, regions with and without obvious peaks can be easily labeled by visual inspection of aligned read counts in a genome browser. We propose a supervised machine learning approach for ChIP-seq data analysis, using labels that encode qualitative judgments about which genomic regions contain or do not contain peaks. The main idea is to manually label a small subset of the genome, and then learn a model that makes consistent peak predictions on the rest of the genome. Results: We created 7 new histone mark datasets with 12 826 visually determined labels, and analyzed 3 existing transcription factor datasets. We observed that default peak detection parameters yield high false positive rates, which can be reduced by learning parameters using a relatively small training set of labeled data from the same experiment type. We also observed that labels from different people are highly consistent. Overall, these data indicate that our supervised labeling method is useful for quantitatively training and testing peak detection algorithms. Availability and Implementation: Labeled histone mark data http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~thocking/chip-seq-chunk-db/ , R package to compute the label error of predicted peaks https://github.com/tdhock/PeakError. Contacts: toby.hocking@mail.mcgill.ca or guil.bourque@mcgill.ca. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.