Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797772›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

ImpulseDE: detection of differentially expressed genes in time series data using impulse models.

Jil Sander, Joachim L Schultze, Nir Yosef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jil SanderGenomics and Immunoregulation, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115, Germany.
Joachim L SchultzeGenomics and Immunoregulation, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115, Germany.
Nir YosefElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, Center for Computational Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1776, USA.

Funding

Rules of gene expression modeled on human dendritic cell response to pathogensU01HG007910 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GARBER, MANUEL, LUBAN, JEREMY · 2015 to 2017
$6.1M
Classification of Cortical Neurons by Single Cell TranscriptomicsU01MH105979 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2014 to 2016
$4.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007910NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH105979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Perturbations in the environment lead to distinctive gene expression changes within a cell. Observed over time, those variations can be characterized by single impulse-like progression patterns. ImpulseDE is an R package suited to capture these patterns in high throughput time series datasets. By fitting a representative impulse model to each gene, it reports differentially expressed genes across time points from a single or between two time courses from two experiments. To optimize running time, the code uses clustering and multi-threading. By applying ImpulseDE , we demonstrate its power to represent underlying biology of gene expression in microarray and RNA-Seq data. Availability and Implementation: ImpulseDE is available on Bioconductor ( https://bioconductor.org/packages/ImpulseDE/ ). Contact: niryosef@berkeley.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationSoftwareAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMiceSequence Analysis, RNATimeT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID27797772
PMCPMC5859984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.