Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797770›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

KAT: a K-mer analysis toolkit to quality control NGS datasets and genome assemblies.

Daniel Mapleson, Gonzalo Garcia Accinelli, George Kettleborough, Jonathan Wright, Bernardo J Clavijo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 323 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
323citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

323 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

263 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel MaplesonEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Gonzalo Garcia AccinelliEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
George KettleboroughEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Jonathan WrightEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Bernardo J ClavijoEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: De novo assembly of whole genome shotgun (WGS) next-generation sequencing (NGS) data benefits from high-quality input with high coverage. However, in practice, determining the quality and quantity of useful reads quickly and in a reference-free manner is not trivial. Gaining a better understanding of the WGS data, and how that data is utilized by assemblers, provides useful insights that can inform the assembly process and result in better assemblies. Results: We present the K-mer Analysis Toolkit (KAT): a multi-purpose software toolkit for reference-free quality control (QC) of WGS reads and de novo genome assemblies, primarily via their k-mer frequencies and GC composition. KAT enables users to assess levels of errors, bias and contamination at various stages of the assembly process. In this paper we highlight KAT's ability to provide valuable insights into assembly composition and quality of genome assemblies through pairwise comparison of k-mers present in both input reads and the assemblies. Availability and Implementation: KAT is available under the GPLv3 license at: https://github.com/TGAC/KAT . Contact: bernardo.clavijo@earlham.ac.uk. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantQuality ControlSoftwareFraxinusHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID27797770
PMCPMC5408915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.