Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27797635›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2017

Shared mechanisms in physiological and pathological nucleoplasmic reticulum formation.

Marek Mateusz Drozdz, David John Vaux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mechanisms for assembly of the nucleoplasmic reticulum.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Lipid Expansion Microscopy.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Components and Mechanisms of Nuclear Mechanotransduction.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marek Mateusz Drozdza Sir William Dunn School of Pathology , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
David John Vauxa Sir William Dunn School of Pathology , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian nuclear envelope (NE) can develop complex dynamic membrane-bounded invaginations in response to both physiological and pathological stimuli. Since the formation of these nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR) structures can occur during interphase, without mitotic NE breakdown and reassembly, some other mechanism must drive their development. Here we consider models for deformation of the interphase NE, together with the evidence for their potential roles in NR formation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansInterphaseMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsNuclear EnvelopeMembrane LipidsMembrane Proteinschromosome territoriescytoskeletongene expressionmembrane curvatureNENRnuclear envelopenucleoplasmic reticulum

Identifiers

PMID27797635
PMCPMC5287099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.