ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017
Quantitative measurement of cerebral blood volume using velocity-selective pulse trains.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrafast Blood TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Velocity-Selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL) for cerebral blood volume assessment in gliomas: comparison with VSASL based cerebral blood flow and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- A straightforward approach for 3D single-shot arterial spin labeling-based brain perfusion imaging: Preventing artifacts due to signal fluctuations.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid flow within ventricles and subarachnoid space evaluated by velocity selective spin labeling MRI.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Blood nulling versus tissue suppression: Enhancing integrated VASO and perfusion (VAPER) contrast for laminar fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Direct angiographic comparison of different velocity-selective saturation, inversion, and DANTE labeling modules on cerebral arteries.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Prostate perfusion mapping using Fourier-transform based velocity-selective arterial spin labeling: Choice of cutoff velocity and comparison with brain.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of 3D stack-of-spiral turbo FLASH acquisitions for pseudo-continuous and velocity-selective ASL-derived brain perfusion mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI: A review of the state of the art and recommendations for clinical implementation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Perfusion measurement in brain gliomas using velocity-selective arterial spin labeling: comparison with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.European radiology · 2022Article
- Quantification of cerebral blood volume changes caused by visual stimulation at 3 T using DANTE-prepared dual-echo EPI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Magnetic resonance angiography and perfusion mapping by arterial spin labeling using Fourier transform-based velocity-selective pulse trains: Examination on a commercial perfusion phantom.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Three-dimensional whole-brain mapping of cerebral blood volume and venous cerebral blood volume using Fourier transform-based velocity-selective pulse trains.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Spatial dependency and the role of local susceptibility for velocity selective arterial spin labeling (VS-ASL) relative tagging efficiency using accelerated 3D radial sampling with a BIR-8 preparation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Ensuring both velocity and spatial responses robust toMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- TFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Lymphocyte-Sparing Radiotherapy: The Rationale for Protecting Lymphocyte-rich Organs When Combining Radiotherapy With Immunotherapy.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2020Review
- Venous contribution to sodium MRI in the human brain.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a non-contrast-enhanced MRI method for cerebral blood volume (CBV) mapping using velocity-selective (VS) pulse trains.
methodsThe new pulse sequence applied velocity-sensitive gradient waveforms in the VS label modules and velocity-compensated ones in the control scans. Sensitivities to the gradient imperfections (e.g., eddy currents) were evaluated through phantom studies. CBV quantification procedures based on simulated labeling efficiencies for arteriolar, capillary, and venular blood as a function of cutoff velocity (Vc) are presented. Experiments were conducted on healthy volunteers at 3T to examine the effects of unbalanced diffusion weighting, cerebrospinal (CSF) contamination and variation of Vc.
resultsPhantom results of the used VS pulse trains demonstrated robustness to eddy currents. The mean CBV values of gray matter and white matter for the experiments using Vc = 3.5 mm/s and velocity-compensated control with CSF-nulling were 5.1 ± 0.6 mL/100 g and 2.4 ± 0.2 mL/100 g, respectively, which were 23% and 32% lower than results from the experiment with velocity-insensitive control, corresponding to 29% and 25% lower in averaged temporal signal-to-noise ratio values.
conclusionA novel technique using VS pulse trains was demonstrated for CBV mapping. The results were both qualitatively and quantitatively close to those from existing methods. Magn Reson Med 77:92-101, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.