Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27796921›Full record

ReviewThe Psychiatric quarterly2017

Training Psychiatry Residents in Professionalism in the Digital World.

Nadyah Janine John, P G Shelton, Michael C Lang, Jennifer Ingersoll

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physician professionalism: definition from a generation perspective.International journal of medical education · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadyah Janine JohnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Mail Stop 635, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. johnn@ecu.edu.
P G SheltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Mail Stop 635, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Michael C LangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Mail Stop 635, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Jennifer IngersollBrody School of Medicine at East Carolina University/Vidant Behavioral Health, 905 Johns Hopkins Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professionalism is an abstract concept which makes it difficult to define, assess and teach. An additional layer of complexity is added when discussing professionalism in the context of digital technology, the internet and social media - the digital world. Current physicians-in-training (residents and fellows) are digital natives having been raised in a digital, media saturated world. Consequently, their use of digital technology and social media has been unconstrained - a reflection of it being integral to their social construct and identity. Cultivating the professional identity and therefore professionalism is the charge of residency training programs. Residents have shown negative and hostile attitudes to formalized professionalism curricula in training. Approaches to these curricula need to consider the learning style of Millennials and incorporate more active learning techniques that utilize technology. Reviewing landmark position papers, guidelines and scholarly work can therefore be augmented with use of vignettes and technology that are available to residency training programs for use with their Millennial learners.

Indexed as

InternetInternship and ResidencySocial MediaHumansProfessional CompetencePsychiatryDigital worldInternetProfessionalismPsychiatristResidentSocial media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.