Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27796852›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study).

Ganesan Karthikeyan, Barbara Guzic Salobir, Borut Jug, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Erick Alexanderson, Joao Vitola, Otakar Kraft, Elgin Ozkan, Saket Sharma, Gaurav Purohit and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01368770 (Stress-rest Single Photon-Emission Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01368770 phase3completednot on this map

Stress-rest Single Photon-Emission Computed Tomography(SPECT)Compared to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical SciencesRan2011 to 2014Enrolled303ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsCoronary CTA, Stress MPI SPECT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Negative predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: A meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Combined strategy of upfront CTCA and optimal treatment for stable chest pain: rationale and design of the CLEAR-CAD trial.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Non-invasive imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: Choosing the right test from the first time.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Functional versus anatomical approach in stable coronary artery disease patients: Perspective of low- and middle-income countries.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Statistical issues associated with terminating a clinical trial due to slow enrollment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Ganesan KarthikeyanDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. karthik2010@gmail.com.
Barbara Guzic SalobirDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Borut JugDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Niveditha DevasenapathyIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Gurgaon, India.
Erick AlexandersonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Joao VitolaQuanta Diagnóstico & Terapia, Curitiba, Brazil.
Otakar KraftDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Elgin OzkanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Saket SharmaIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Gurgaon, India.
Gaurav PurohitDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Maja Dolenc NovakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aloha MeaveDepartment of Radiology, Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sergio TrevethanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rodrigo CerciQuanta Diagnóstico & Terapia, Curitiba, Brazil.
Sandra ZierQuanta Diagnóstico & Terapia, Curitiba, Brazil.
Lucia GotthardtováDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tomáš JonsztaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Timucin AltinDepartment of Cardiology, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Cigdem SoydalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Chetan PatelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gurpreet GulatiDepartment of Cardiac Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Diana PaezDivision of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Maurizio DondiDivision of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Ravi KashyapDivision of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that, in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) would result in less downstream testing than coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).

methodsIn this international, randomized trial, mildly symptomatic patients with an intermediate likelihood of having CAD, and asymptomatic patients at intermediate risk of cardiac events, underwent either initial stress-rest MPI or CCTA. The primary outcome was downstream noninvasive or invasive testing at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included cumulative effective radiation dose (ERD) and costs at 12 months.

resultsWe recruited 303 patients (151 MPI and 152 CTA) from 6 centers in 6 countries. The initial MPI was abnormal in 29% (41/143) and CCTA in 56% (79/141) of patients. Fewer patients undergoing initial stress-rest MPI had further downstream testing at 6 months (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91, P = 0.023). There was a small increase in the median cumulative ERD with MPI (9.6 vs. 8.8 mSv, P = 0.04), but no difference in costs between the two strategies at 12 months.

conclusionIn the management of patients with suspected CAD, a strategy of initial stress MPI is substantially less likely to require further downstream testing than initial testing with CCTA.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identification number NCT01368770.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseEarly DiagnosisFemaleHeart Function TestsHumansInternationalityMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitycomputed tomographycoronary artery diseaseMyocardial perfusion imaging—SPECT

Identifiers

PMID27796852
PMCPMC5413523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.