Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27796761›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2017

In-Depth Proteomic Analysis of the Porcine Retina by Use of a four Step Differential Extraction Bottom up LC MS Platform.

Sebastian Funke, Sascha Markowitsch, Carsten Schmelter, Natarajan Perumal, Francis Kamau Mwiiri, Silke Gabel-Scheurich, Norbert Pfeiffer, Franz H Grus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mass spectrometry-based retina proteomics.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An In-Depth View of the Porcine Trabecular Meshwork Proteome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian FunkeExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Sascha MarkowitschExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Carsten SchmelterExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Natarajan PerumalExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Francis Kamau MwiiriExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Silke Gabel-ScheurichExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Norbert PfeifferExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Franz H GrusExperimental Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. grus@eye-research.org.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation 961-386261/1081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eye of the house swine (Sus scrofa domestica Linnaeus, 1758) represents a promising model for the study of human eye diseases encircling neurodegenerative retina disorders that go along with proteomic changes. To provide an in-depth view into the "normal" (untreated & healthy) porcine retina proteome as an important reference, a proteomic strategy has been developed encircling stepwise/differential extraction, LC MS and peptide de novo sequencing. Accordingly, pooled porcine retina homogenates were processed by stepwise DDM, CHAPS, ASB14 and ACN/TFA extraction. Retinal proteins were fractionated by 1D-SDS PAGE and further analyzed by LC ESI MS following database and de novo sequencing related protein identification and functional analyses. In summary, >2000 retinal proteins (FDR < 1 %) could be identified by use of the highly reproducible and selective extraction procedure. Moreover, an identification surplus of 36 % comparing initial one step extraction to the four step method could be documented. Despite most proteins were identified in the DDM and CHAPS fraction, all extraction steps contributed exclusive proteins with nucleus proteins enriched in the final ACN/TFA fraction. Additionally, for the first time new non-annotated de novo peptides could be documented for the porcine retina. The generated porcine retina proteome reference map contributes importantly to the understanding of the pig eye proteome and the developed workflow has strong translational potential considering retina studies of various species.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, LiquidFemaleMaleProteomicsRetinaSwineTandem Mass SpectrometryDifferential extractionPigProteomicsRetina

Identifiers

PMID27796761
OpenAlexW2539735750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.