ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017
Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion stratified by baseline visual acuity.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of real-world evidence of the management of macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.Eye (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Therapeutic Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine on a Rat Model of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the clinical features and bevacizumab efficacy for macular edema (ME) following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) stratified by baseline visual acuity.
methodsThis retrospective study included a total 117 eyes from 117 consecutive patients with ME following BRVO, who received PRN intravitreal bevacizumab injection and were followed for more than 6 months. The eyes were categorized into three groups according to baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (group A, BCVA <20/200; group B, BCVA ≥20/200 and ≤20/40; group C, BCVA >20/40). Baseline demographics, clinical features, BCVA, and central retinal thickness (CRT) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injection and the number of injections were compared.
resultsGroups A-C included 11, 83, and 23 eyes, respectively. The mean baseline CRT was thickest in group A (810.1, 580.8, and 473.5 μm in groups A-C, respectively; p < 0.001) and the percentage of eyes with macular ischemia increased in the worst BCVA group (45.5, 25.0, and 4.3 % in groups A-C, respectively; p = 0.005). The mean BCVA and CRT improved at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment compared to baseline values in all groups (all, p < 0.001). The number of injections for 6 months was greater in the worst BCVA group (3.2, 2.3, and 1.9 injections in groups A-C, respectively; p = 0.009).
conclusionIn ME following BRVO, baseline visual acuity correlates with macular ischemia and baseline CRT. Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment results in significant anatomical and functional improvement regardless of baseline visual acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27796671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.