Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27796590›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2017

Poisonous or non-poisonous plants? DNA-based tools and applications for accurate identification.

Valerio Mezzasalma, Ioannis Ganopoulos, Andrea Galimberti, Laura Cornara, Emanuele Ferri, Massimo Labra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Poisoning by Plants.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Swipe Right: a Comparison of Accuracy of Plant Identification Apps for Toxic Plants.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Advances in DNA Barcoding of Toxic Marine Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerio MezzasalmaZooPlantLab, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.za Della Scienza 2, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Ioannis GanopoulosInstitute of Applied Biosciences, CERTH, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 570 01, Greece.
Andrea GalimbertiZooPlantLab, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.za Della Scienza 2, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Laura CornaraDISTAV, Università di Genova, Corso Europa 26, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Emanuele FerriFEM2 Ambiente s.r.l., P.za della Scienza 2, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Massimo LabraZooPlantLab, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.za Della Scienza 2, 20126, Milan, Italy. massimo.labra@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-5804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant exposures are among the most frequently reported cases to poison control centres worldwide. This is a growing condition due to recent societal trends oriented towards the consumption of wild plants as food, cosmetics, or medicine. At least three general causes of plant poisoning can be identified: plant misidentification, introduction of new plant-based supplements and medicines with no controls about their safety, and the lack of regulation for the trading of herbal and phytochemical products. Moreover, an efficient screening for the occurrence of plants poisonous to humans is also desirable at the different stages of the food supply chain: from the raw material to the final transformed product. A rapid diagnosis of intoxication cases is necessary in order to provide the most reliable treatment. However, a precise taxonomic characterization of the ingested species is often challenging. In this review, we provide an overview of the emerging DNA-based tools and technologies to address the issue of poisonous plant identification. Specifically, classic DNA barcoding and its applications using High Resolution Melting (Bar-HRM) ensure high universality and rapid response respectively, whereas High Throughput Sequencing techniques (HTS) provide a complete characterization of plant residues in complex matrices. The pros and cons of each approach have been evaluated with the final aim of proposing a general user's guide to molecular identification directed to different stakeholder categories interested in the diagnostics of poisonous plants.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, PlantForensic ToxicologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPlants, ToxicPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA, PlantAlkaloidsDNA barcodingFood supply chainMolecular identificationPoison centresSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.