ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2017
Neuromolecular imaging, a nanobiotechnology for Parkinson's disease: advancing pharmacotherapy for personalized medicine.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted drug delivery in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of nanotechnology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Unraveling neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease: Nrf2-Keap1 pathway's vital role amidst pathogenic pathways.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Review
- Fluid markers of synapse degeneration in synucleinopathies.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating each patient and animal as its own control achieves personalized medicine, which honors the hippocratic philosophy, explaining that "it is far more important to know what person has the disease than what disease the person has." Similarly, individualizing molecular signaling directly from the patient's brain in real time is essential for providing prompt, patient-based treatment as dictated by the point of care. Fortunately, nanotechnology effectively treats many neurodegenerative diseases. In particular, the new medicinal frontier for the discovery of therapy for Parkinson's disease is nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology. Indeed, the unique nanotechnology of neuromolecular imaging combined with the series of nanobiosensors enables continuous videotracking of molecular neurotransmitters in both the normal physiologic and disease states with long-term electrochemical operational stability. This nanobiotechnology is able to track a signal in real time with excellent temporal and spatial resolution directly from each patient's brain to a computer as subjects are behaving during movement, normal and/or dysfunctional including prion-like Parkinson's behavioral biometrics. Moreover, the molecular signaling performed by these nanobiosensors live streams directly online and originates from precise neuroanatomic brain sites such as, in this case, the dorsal striatum in basal ganglia. Thus, the nanobiotechnology studies discussed herein imaged neuromolecules with and without L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) in dorsal striatal basal ganglia neurons. Parkinsonian and non-Parkinsonian animals were video-tracked, and images were readily seen on a laptop via a potentiostat using a semiderivative electrical circuit. Administered L-DOPA doses were 50 and 100 mg/kg intraperitoneally (ip); the same experimental paradigm was used to image and then contrast data. Results showed that the baseline release of biogenic amine molecules was significantly above detection limits in non-Parkinsonian animals. After administration of L-DOPA, biogenic amines significantly increased in these non-Parkinson's animals. Nevertheless, it is intriguing to see that L-DOPA could not enable synaptic dopamine release in Parkinson's animals, thereby demonstrating that biogenic amines are biomarkers for Parkinson's disease. Biomarkers are biochemical, genetic, or molecular measures of biological reactions. Importantly, there were other significant biomarkers present in Parkinsonian animals and absent in non-Parkinsonian animals; these were peptide neurotransmitters that include dynorphin and somatostatin in the brain with detection limits of 40 nM for dynorphin and 37 nM for somatostatin (see Table 1). Furthermore, L-DOPA significantly increased these peptide biomarkers, dynorphin and somatostatin, in Parkinson's animals. Targeting biomarkers enables new diagnostic devices and treatments for Parkinson's disease through nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.