Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27796422›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2017

Type 1 diabetes mellitus and risk of incident epilepsy: a population-based, open-cohort study.

George E Dafoulas, Konstantinos A Toulis, Dougall Mccorry, Balachadran Kumarendran, G Neil Thomas, Brian H Willis, Krishna Gokhale, George Gkoutos, Parth Narendran, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Type 1 diabetes and the risk of epilepsy: A meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway in Epilepsy.Current neuropharmacology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George E DafoulasInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Konstantinos A ToulisInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Dougall MccorryDepartment of Neuroscience, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Balachadran KumarendranInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
G Neil ThomasInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Brian H WillisInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Krishna GokhaleInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
George GkoutosCentre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Parth NarendranCentre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Room 229, Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. p.narendran@bham.ac.uk.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham · GB424 General Military Hospital · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701649Medical Research Council MR/N007999/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe aim of this research was to explore the relationship between incident epilepsy and type 1 diabetes in British participants.

methodsUsing The Health Improvement Network database, we conducted a retrospective, open-cohort study. Patients who were newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus at the age of ≤40 years were identified and followed-up from 1 January 1990 to 15 September 2015. These patients, identified as not suffering from epilepsy at the time of diagnosis, were randomly matched with up to four individuals without type 1 diabetes mellitus, based on age, sex and participating general practice. A Cox regression analysis was subsequently performed using Townsend deprivation index, cerebral palsy, head injury and learning disabilities as model covariates.

resultsThe study population consisted of a total of 24,610 individuals (4922 with type 1 diabetes and 19,688 controls). These individuals were followed up for a mean of 5.4 years (approximately 132,000 person-years of follow up). Patients with type 1 diabetes were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with epilepsy during the observation period compared with controls (crude HR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.95, 4.69]). The incidence rate was estimated to be 132 and 44 per 100,000 person-years in patients and controls, respectively. This finding persisted after adjusting for model covariates (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 3.01 [1.93, 4.68]) and was also robust to sensitivity analysis, excluding adult-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationPatients with type 1 diabetes are at approximately three-times greater risk of developing epilepsy compared with matched controls without type 1 diabetes. This should be considered when investigating seizure-related disorders in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1EpilepsyFemaleHumansHypoglycemiaInsulinMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultInsulinEpilepsyHypoglycaemiaInsulinSeizuresType 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID27796422
PMCPMC6518067
OpenAlexW2540674574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.