Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27795906›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Pilot-testing an adverse drug event reporting form prior to its implementation in an electronic health record.

Adam Chruscicki, Katherin Badke, David Peddie, Serena Small, Ellen Balka, Corinne M Hohl

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam ChruscickiFaculty of Medicine, Queen's University, 15 Arch Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N8 Canada.
Katherin BadkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada.
David PeddieSchool of Communication, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1A6 Canada.
Serena SmallSchool of Communication, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1A6 Canada.
Ellen BalkaSchool of Communication, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1A6 Canada ; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 828 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada.
Corinne M HohlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada ; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 828 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada.
Simon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug events (ADEs), harmful unintended consequences of medication use, are a leading cause of hospital admissions, yet are rarely documented in a structured format between care providers. We describe pilot-testing structured ADE documentation fields prior to integration into an electronic medical record (EMR).

methodsWe completed a qualitative study at two Canadian hospitals. Using data derived from a systematic review of the literature, we developed screen mock-ups for an ADE reporting platform, iteratively revised in participatory workshops with diverse end-user groups. We designed a paper-based form reflecting the data elements contained in the mock-ups. We distributed them to a convenience sample of clinical pharmacists, and completed ethnographic workplace observations while the forms were used. We reviewed completed forms, collected feedback from pharmacists using semi-structured interviews, and coded the data in NVivo for themes related to the ADE form.

resultsWe completed 25 h of clinical observations, and 24 ADEs were documented. Pharmacists perceived the form as simple and clear, with sufficient detail to capture ADEs. They identified fields for omission, and others requiring more detail. Pharmacists encountered barriers to documenting ADEs including uncertainty about what constituted a reportable ADE, inability to complete patient follow-up, the need for inter-professional communication to rule out alternative diagnoses, and concern about creating a permanent record.

conclusionPaper-based pilot-testing allowed planning for important modifications in an ADE documentation form prior to implementation in an EMR. While paper-based piloting is rarely reported prior to EMR implementations, it can inform design and enhance functionality. Piloting with other groups of care providers and in different healthcare settings will likely lead to further revisions prior to broader implementations.

Indexed as

Adverse drug eventsElectronic medical recordsPilot-testingReporting

Identifiers

PMID27795906
PMCPMC5056922
OpenAlexW2530487074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.