ArticleBiomicrofluidics2016
Surface micromachining of polydimethylsiloxane for microfluidics applications.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Plasma Surface Engineering and Dielectric Tailoring of PDMS Toward High-Output Triboelectric Energy Harvesting.Small methods · 2026Article
- A Thorough Review of Emerging Technologies in Micro- and Nanochannel Fabrication: Limitations, Applications, and Comparison.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Micromanufactured Tactile Samples for Characterization of Rough and Dry Tactile Perception.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Recent Advancements in Microneedle Technology for Multifaceted Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Improvement in Strain Sensor Stability by Adapting the Metal Contact Layer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Fabrication of Nanostructures on Polydimethylsiloxane by Laser Interference Lithography.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer has emerged as one of the most frequently applied materials in microfluidics. However, precise and large-scale surface micromachining of PDMS remains challenging, limiting applications of PDMS for microfluidic structures with high-resolution features. Herein, surface patterning of PDMS was achieved using a simple yet effective method combining direct photolithography followed by reactive-ion etching (RIE). This method incorporated a unique step of using oxygen plasma to activate PDMS surfaces to a hydrophilic state, thereby enabling improved adhesion of photoresist on top of PDMS surfaces for subsequent photolithography. RIE was applied to transfer patterns from photoresist to underlying PDMS thin films. Systematic experiments were conducted in the present work to characterize PDMS etch rate and etch selectivity of PDMS to photoresist as a function of various RIE parameters, including pressure, RF power, and gas flow rate and composition. We further compared two common RIE systems with and without bias power and employed inductively coupled plasma and capacitively coupled plasma sources, respectively, in terms of their PDMS etching performances. The RIE-based PDMS surface micromachining technique is compatible with conventional Si-based surface and bulk micromachining techniques, thus opening promising opportunities for generating hybrid microfluidic devices with novel functionalities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.