Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27795682›Full record

ArticleBreeding science2016

The impact of the SSIIa

Ermelinda Botticella, Francesco Sestili, Gianluca Ferrazzano, Paola Mantovani, Alessandro Cammerata, Maria Grazia D'Egidio, Domenico Lafiandra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breeding science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ermelinda BotticellaDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia , Via San Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo , Italy.
Francesco SestiliDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia , Via San Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo , Italy.
Gianluca FerrazzanoSocietà Produttori Sementi , Via Macero 1; 40050 Argelato (BO) , Italy.
Paola MantovaniSocietà Produttori Sementi , Via Macero 1; 40050 Argelato (BO) , Italy.
Alessandro CammerataResearch Unit for Cereal Quality, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics , Via Manziana 30, 00189 Roma , Italy.
Maria Grazia D'EgidioResearch Unit for Cereal Quality, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics , Via Manziana 30, 00189 Roma , Italy.
Domenico LafiandraDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia , Via San Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starch represents a major nutrient in the human diet providing essentially a source of energy. More recently the modification of its composition has been associated with new functionalities both at the nutritional and technological level. Targeting the major starch biosynthetic enzymes has been shown to be a valuable strategy to manipulate the amylose-amylopectin ratio in reserve starch. In the present work a breeding strategy aiming to produce a set of SSIIa (starch synthases IIa)

Indexed as

dietary fiberdurum wheathigh amylosestarch

Identifiers

PMID27795682
PMCPMC5010308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.