Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27795555›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2017

Targeted deep sequencing reveals clinically relevant subclonal IgHV rearrangements in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

B Stamatopoulos, A Timbs, D Bruce, T Smith, R Clifford, P Robbe, A Burns, D V Vavoulis, L Lopez, P Antoniou and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

B StamatopoulosOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
A TimbsOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
D BruceOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
T SmithDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Computational Genomics Analysis and Training Programme, MRC Functional Genomics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
R CliffordOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
P RobbeOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
A BurnsOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
D V VavoulisNuffield Department of Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
L LopezOxford Medical Genetics Laboratories, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
P AntoniouNuffield Department of Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J MasonOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
H DreauOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
A SchuhOxford NIHR BRC Molecular Diagnostic Centre, John Radcliffe Site, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBGenomics (United Kingdom) · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene (IgHV) mutational status is considered the gold standard of prognostication in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and is currently determined by Sanger sequencing that allows the analysis of the major clone. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we sequenced the IgHV gene from two independent cohorts: (A) 270 consecutive patient samples obtained at diagnosis and (B) 227 patients from the UK ARCTIC-AdMIRe clinical trials. Using complementary DNA from purified CD19+CD5+ cells, we demonstrate the presence of multiple rearrangements in independent experiments and showed that 24.4% of CLL patients express multiple productive clonally unrelated IgHV rearrangements. On the basis of IgHV-NGS subclonal profiles, we defined five different categories: patients with (a) multiple hypermutated (M) clones, (b) 1 M clone, (c) a mix of M-unmutated (UM) clones, (d) 1 UM clone and (e) multiple UM clones. In population A, IgHV-NGS classification stratified patients into five different subgroups with median treatment-free survival (TFS) of >280(a), 131(b), 94(c), 29(d), 15(e) months (P<0.0001) and a median OS of >397(a), 292(b), 196(c), 137(d) and 100(e) months (P<0.0001). In population B, the poor prognosis of multiple UM patients was confirmed with a median TFS of 2 months (P=0.0038). In conclusion, IgHV-NGS highlighted one quarter of CLL patients with multiple productive IgHV subclones and improves disease stratification and raises important questions concerning the pre-leukemic cellular origin of CLL.

Indexed as

Genes, Immunoglobulin Heavy ChainBiomarkersB-LymphocytesClonal EvolutionFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Variable RegionImmunophenotypingLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMutationPhenotypePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkersImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Variable Region

Identifiers

PMID27795555
OpenAlexW2543345947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.