ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2017
Comparison of Silent and Conventional MR Imaging for the Evaluation of Myelination in Children.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-enhanced zero echo time silent brain magnetic resonance imaging in infants without sedation.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Model-based reconstruction for looping-star MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical utility of new bone imaging using zero-echo-time sequence in neurosurgical procedures: Can zero-echo-time be used in clinical practice in neurosurgery?The neuroradiology journal · 2023Article
- Current state of pediatric neuro-oncology imaging, challenges and future directions.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- MR Imaging in the 21st Century: Technical Innovation over the First Two Decades.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022Review
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 3D T1 Silent imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2021Article
- Silent zero TE MR neuroimaging: Current state-of-the-art and future directions.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2021Review
- Silent susceptibility-weighted angiography to detect hemorrhagic lesions in the brain: a clinical and phantom study.Neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Low intensity white noise improves performance in auditory working memory task: An fMRI study.Heliyon · 2019Article
- Comparison of lung imaging using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time and zero echo time sequences: preliminary study.European radiology · 2019Article
- Image quality assessment of silent TThe British journal of radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2017
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSilent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans produce reduced acoustic noise and are considered more gentle for sedated children. The aim of this study was to compare the validity of T MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 30 children (21 boys, 9 girls; age range: 1-83 months, mean age: 35.5 months, median age: 28.5 months) were examined using both silent and spin-echo sequences. Acoustic noise levels were analyzed and compared. The degree of myelination was qualitatively assessed via consensus, and T
resultsAcoustic noise levels were significantly lower during silent sequences than during conventional sequences (P < 0.0001 for both T
conclusionsFor brain MRI, silent sequences significantly reduced acoustic noise and provided diagnostic image quality for myelination evaluations; however, the two methods differed with respect to cerebellar delineation on T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.