Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27795440›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2017

ϕX174 Procapsid Assembly: Effects of an Inhibitory External Scaffolding Protein and Resistant Coat Proteins In Vitro.

James E Cherwa, Joshua Tyson, Gregory J Bedwell, Dewey Brooke, Ashton G Edwards, Terje Dokland, Peter E Prevelige, Bentley A Fane

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James E CherwaDepartment of Biology, Central Alabama Community College, Alexander City, Alabama, USA jcherwajr@cacc.edu.
Joshua TysonDepartment of Biology, Central Alabama Community College, Alexander City, Alabama, USA.
Gregory J BedwellDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Dewey BrookeDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Ashton G EdwardsJefferson County International Baccalaureate School, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Terje DoklandDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Peter E PreveligeDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Bentley A FaneSchool of Plant Sciences and the BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCentral Alabama Community College · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During ϕX174 morphogenesis, 240 copies of the external scaffolding protein D organize 12 pentameric assembly intermediates into procapsids, a reaction reconstituted in vitro In previous studies, ϕX174 strains resistant to exogenously expressed dominant lethal D genes were experimentally evolved. Resistance was achieved by the stepwise acquisition of coat protein mutations. Once resistance was established, a stimulatory D protein mutation that greatly increased strain fitness arose. In this study, in vitro biophysical and biochemical methods were utilized to elucidate the mechanistic details and evolutionary trade-offs created by the resistance mutations. The kinetics of procapsid formation was analyzed in vitro using wild-type, inhibitory, and experimentally evolved coat and scaffolding proteins. Our data suggest that viral fitness is correlated with in vitro assembly kinetics and demonstrate that in vivo experimental evolution can be analyzed within an in vitro biophysical context. IMPORTANCE: Experimental evolution is an extremely valuable tool. Comparisons between ancestral and evolved genotypes suggest hypotheses regarding adaptive mechanisms. However, it is not always possible to rigorously test these hypotheses in vivo We applied in vitro biophysical and biochemical methods to elucidate the mechanistic details that allowed an experimentally evolved virus to become resistant to an antiviral protein and then evolve a productive use for that protein. Moreover, our results indicate that the respective roles of scaffolding and coat proteins may have been redistributed during the evolution of a two-scaffolding-protein system. In one-scaffolding-protein virus assembly systems, coat proteins promiscuously interact to form heterogeneous aberrant structures in the absence of scaffolding proteins. Thus, the scaffolding protein controls fidelity. During ϕX174 assembly, the external scaffolding protein acts like a coat protein, self-associating into large aberrant spherical structures in the absence of coat protein, whereas the coat protein appears to control fidelity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, ViralVirus AssemblyBacteriophage phi X 174CapsidCapsid ProteinsDirected Molecular EvolutionGenes, LethalGenetic FitnessKineticsModels, MolecularMutationProtein DomainsProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, SecondaryCapsid Proteinsbacteriophage ϕX174Microviridaemicrovirusscaffolding proteinvirus assembly

Identifiers

PMID27795440
PMCPMC5165185
OpenAlexW2545122667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.