ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2017
Clinical Microbiology Laboratories' Adoption of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests Is a Threat to Foodborne-Disease Surveillance in the United States.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-genome sequencing-based pathogen characterization for streptococcal infection directly from positive blood culture samples.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Sexually transmitted enteric infections in men who have sex with men.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Panels for Gastrointestinal Infections: Current Evidence, Regulatory Hurdles, and the Way Forward.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Percentage of culture confirmation and melting curve analysis reveals false-positiveJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effects of Food Safety Training on the Microbiological Load Present in Equipment, Surfaces, Utensils, and Food Manipulator's Hands in Restaurants.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- The effect of changing diagnostic method from culture to PCR on the number of episodes of human campylobacteriosis in Denmark: a retrospective study (2015-2022).Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel and Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel comparative evaluation.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- A Pilot Study to Detect ViableInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- An Improved Real-Time Viability PCR Assay to DetectInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Shotgun metagenomics of fecal samples from children in Peru reveals frequent complex co-infections with multiple Campylobacter species.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Is the Medium Still the Message? Culture-Independent Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infections.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Targeted metagenomics using next generation sequencing in laboratory diagnosis of culture negative endophthalmitis.Heliyon · 2021Article
- Real-time gastrointestinal infection surveillance through a cloud-based network of clinical laboratories.PloS one · 2021Article
- Coverage of the national surveillance system for human Salmonella infections, Belgium, 2016-2020.PloS one · 2021Article
- Foodborne Pathogenic Vibrios: Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Reporter Phage-Based Detection of Bacterial Pathogens: Design Guidelines and Recent Developments.Viruses · 2020Review
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Food Safety and Hygiene Training on Food Handlers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Genomic Surveillance Enables Suitability Assessment ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Outbreak of gastroenteritis highlighting the diagnostic and epidemiological challenges of enteroinvasiveEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020Article
- Impact of the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel on patient care and infection control.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTIONIn November 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sent a letter to state and territorial epidemiologists, state and territorial public health laboratory directors, and state and territorial health officials. In this letter, culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) for detection of enteric pathogens were characterized as "a serious and current threat to public health surveillance, particularly for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella" The document says CDC and its public health partners are approaching this issue, in part, by "reviewing regulatory authority in public health agencies to require culture isolates or specimen submission if CIDTs are used." Large-scale foodborne outbreaks are a continuing threat to public health, and tracking these outbreaks is an important tool in shortening them and developing strategies to prevent them. It is clear that the use of CIDTs for enteric pathogen detection, including both antigen detection and multiplex nucleic acid amplification techniques, is becoming more widespread. Furthermore, some clinical microbiology laboratories will resist the mandate to require submission of culture isolates, since it will likely not improve patient outcomes but may add significant costs. Specimen submission would be less expensive and time-consuming for clinical laboratories; however, this approach would be burdensome for public health laboratories, since those laboratories would need to perform culture isolation prior to typing. Shari Shea and Kristy Kubota from the Association of Public Health Laboratories, along with state public health laboratory officials from Colorado, Missouri, Tennessee, and Utah, will explain the public health laboratories' perspective on why having access to isolates of enteric pathogens is essential for public health surveillance, detection, and tracking of outbreaks and offer potential workable solutions which will allow them to do this. Marc Couturier of ARUP Laboratories and Melissa Miller of the University of North Carolina will explain the advantages of CIDTs for enteric pathogens and discuss practical solutions for clinical microbiology laboratories to address these public health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.