ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2017
What's in a Name? New Bacterial Species and Changes to Taxonomic Status from 2012 through 2015.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An Update on the Novel Genera and Species and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacterial Organisms Described in 2016 and 2017.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Update on novel, validly published, and included bacterial taxa derived from nondomestic animals and taxonomic revisions published in 2024.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- An update on novel taxa and revised taxonomic status of bacteria isolated from human clinical specimens described in 2024.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- Update on novel validly published and included bacterial taxa derived from human clinical specimens and taxonomic revisions published in 2023.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- An update on novel taxa and revised taxonomic status of bacteria isolated from domestic companion and agricultural animals described in 2023.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- An update on novel taxa and revised taxonomic status of bacteria isolated from non-domestic animals described in 2022.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Update on novel validly published taxa of bacteria isolated from domestic animals described in 2022.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Valid and accepted novel bacterial taxa derived from human clinical specimens and taxonomic revisions published in 2022.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Change of Plans: Overview of Bacterial Taxonomy, Recent Changes of Medical Importance, and Potential Areas of Impact.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Review
- Update on Accepted Novel Bacterial Isolates Derived from Human Clinical Specimens and Taxonomic Revisions Published in 2020 and 2021.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Summary of Novel Bacterial Isolates Derived from Human Clinical Specimens and Nomenclature Revisions Published in 2018 and 2019.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Review
- Advantages and Limitations of 16S rRNA Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification in the Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory: Perspectives from a Middle-Income Country.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Performance and Application of 16S rRNA Gene Cycle Sequencing for Routine Identification of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Review
- Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Rubik's Cube of Clinical Microbiology?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- A Rose by Any Other Name: Practical Updates on Microbial Nomenclature for Clinical Microbiology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technological advancements in fields such as molecular genetics and the human microbiome have resulted in an unprecedented recognition of new bacterial genus/species designations by the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology Knowledge of designations involving clinically significant bacterial species would benefit clinical microbiologists in the context of emerging pathogens, performance of accurate organism identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In anticipation of subsequent taxonomic changes being compiled by the Journal of Clinical Microbiology on a biannual basis, this compendium summarizes novel species and taxonomic revisions specific to bacteria derived from human clinical specimens from the calendar years 2012 through 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.