Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27795320›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2017

Cell-Biological Studies of Osmotic Shock Response in Streptomyces spp.

Katsuya Fuchino, Klas Flärdh, Paul Dyson, Nora Ausmees

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Osmotic stress triggers fast and reversible PMF collapse inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Sigma Factor Engineering inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katsuya FuchinoDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden katsuya.fuchino@biol.lu.se.
Klas FlärdhDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Paul DysonSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-2666
Nora AusmeesDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESwansea University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E019242/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most bacteria are likely to face osmotic challenges, but there is yet much to learn about how such environmental changes affect the architecture of bacterial cells. Here, we report a cell-biological study in model organisms of the genus Streptomyces, which are actinobacteria that grow in a highly polarized fashion to form branching hyphae. The characteristic apical growth of Streptomyces hyphae is orchestrated by protein assemblies, called polarisomes, which contain coiled-coil proteins DivIVA and Scy, and recruit cell wall synthesis complexes and the stress-bearing cytoskeleton of FilP to the tip regions of the hyphae. We monitored cell growth and cell-architectural changes by time-lapse microscopy in osmotic upshift experiments. Hyperosmotic shock caused arrest of growth, loss of turgor, and hypercondensation of chromosomes. The recovery period was protracted, presumably due to the dehydrated state of the cytoplasm, before hyphae could restore their turgor and start to grow again. In most hyphae, this regrowth did not take place at the original hyphal tips. Instead, cell polarity was reprogrammed, and polarisomes were redistributed to new sites, leading to the emergence of multiple lateral branches from which growth occurred. Factors known to regulate the branching pattern of Streptomyces hyphae, such as the serine/threonine kinase AfsK and Scy, were not involved in reprogramming of cell polarity, indicating that different mechanisms may act under different environmental conditions to control hyphal branching. Our observations of hyphal morphology during the stress response indicate that turgor and sufficient hydration of cytoplasm are required for Streptomyces tip growth. IMPORTANCE: Polar growth is an intricate manner of growth for accomplishing a complicated morphology, employed by a wide range of organisms across the kingdoms of life. The tip extension of Streptomyces hyphae is one of the most pronounced examples of polar growth among bacteria. The expansion of the cell wall by tip extension is thought to be facilitated by the turgor pressure, but it was unknown how external osmotic change influences Streptomyces tip growth. We report here that severe hyperosmotic stress causes cessation of growth, followed by reprogramming of cell polarity and rearrangement of growth zones to promote lateral hyphal branching. This phenomenon may represent a strategy of hyphal organisms to avoid osmotic stress encountered by the growing hyphal tip.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCell WallCytoskeletonDNA, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationOsmotic PressureStreptomycesStress, PhysiologicalWaterBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialWaterapical growthbacterial cytoskeletonosmotic stress responseStreptomycesturgor

Identifiers

PMID27795320
PMCPMC5165099
OpenAlexW2537157340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.