Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27795231›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017

Robustness of Reconstructed Ancestral Protein Functions to Statistical Uncertainty.

Geeta N Eick, Jamie T Bridgham, Douglas P Anderson, Michael J Harms, Joseph W Thornton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Favorable epistasis in ancestral diterpene synthases promoted convergent evolution of a resin acid precursor in conifers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Applications of ancestral sequence reconstruction for understanding the evolution of plant specialized metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geeta N EickInstitute of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Jamie T BridghamInstitute of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Douglas P AndersonInstitute of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Michael J HarmsInstitute of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Joseph W ThorntonDepartment of Ecology & Evolution and Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Funding

Mechanisms for the evolution of novel DNA specificity in a transcription factor fR01GM104397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI THORNTON, JOSEPH W · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Regulated spindle orientation during asymmetric cell divisionR01GM087457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PREHODA, KENNETH E · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypotheses about the functions of ancient proteins and the effects of historical mutations on them are often tested using ancestral protein reconstruction (APR)-phylogenetic inference of ancestral sequences followed by synthesis and experimental characterization. Usually, some sequence sites are ambiguously reconstructed, with two or more statistically plausible states. The extent to which the inferred functions and mutational effects are robust to uncertainty about the ancestral sequence has not been studied systematically. To address this issue, we reconstructed ancestral proteins in three domain families that have different functions, architectures, and degrees of uncertainty; we then experimentally characterized the functional robustness of these proteins when uncertainty was incorporated using several approaches, including sampling amino acid states from the posterior distribution at each site and incorporating the alternative amino acid state at every ambiguous site in the sequence into a single "worst plausible case" protein. In every case, qualitative conclusions about the ancestral proteins' functions and the effects of key historical mutations were robust to sequence uncertainty, with similar functions observed even when scores of alternate amino acids were incorporated. There was some variation in quantitative descriptors of function among plausible sequences, suggesting that experimentally characterizing robustness is particularly important when quantitative estimates of ancient biochemical parameters are desired. The worst plausible case method appears to provide an efficient strategy for characterizing the functional robustness of ancestral proteins to large amounts of sequence uncertainty. Sampling from the posterior distribution sometimes produced artifactually nonfunctional proteins for sequences reconstructed with substantial ambiguity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceBiometryDNA, AncientLikelihood FunctionsMutationPhylogenyProtein DomainsProteinsSequence AlignmentStructure-Activity RelationshipUncertaintyDNA, AncientProteinsancestral protein reconstructionancestral sequence reconstructionprotein evolution

Identifiers

PMID27795231
PMCPMC6095102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.