Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27794452›Full record

ReviewBehavioural processes2017

Resurgence as Choice.

Timothy A Shahan, Andrew R Craig

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioural processes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03423940 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Basic and Clinical Studies in Reinforcing Positive Behaviors in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2018 to 2023Enrolled17ConditionsProblem Behavior, Self-injury, CommunicationArmsFunctional communication training
NCT05790668 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Motivational Refinements for Facilitating Reinforcement Schedule Thinning

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2023 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsDecreasing Destructive Behavior, Increasing Functional Communicative BehaviorArmsTraditional Schedule Thinning, PIA-Informed Schedule Thinning, PIA-Informed Schedule Thinning with Competing Stimuli
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Human-operant evaluation of synthesized alternative reinforcement and resurgence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The extinction burst: Effects of alternative reinforcement magnitude.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The extinction burst: Effects of reinforcement magnitude.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy A ShahanUtah State University, United States. Electronic address: tim.shahan@usu.edu.
Andrew R CraigUtah State University, United States.

Funding

Theory of Resurgence of Cocaine SeekingR21DA037725 · NIDA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHAHAN, TIMOTHY A · 2014 to 2015
$344k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurgence is typically defined as an increase in a previously extinguished target behavior when a more recently reinforced alternative behavior is later extinguished. Some treatments of the phenomenon have suggested that it might also extend to circumstances where either the historic or more recently reinforced behavior is reduced by other non-extinction related means (e.g., punishment, decreases in reinforcement rate, satiation, etc.). Here we present a theory of resurgence suggesting that the phenomenon results from the same basic processes governing choice. In its most general form, the theory suggests that resurgence results from changes in the allocation of target behavior driven by changes in the values of the target and alternative options across time. Specifically, resurgence occurs when there is an increase in the relative value of an historically effective target option as a result of a subsequent devaluation of a more recently effective alternative option. We develop a more specific quantitative model of how extinction of the target and alternative responses in a typical resurgence paradigm might produce such changes in relative value across time using a temporal weighting rule. The example model does a good job in accounting for the effects of reinforcement rate and related manipulations on resurgence in simple schedules where Behavioral Momentum Theory has failed. We also discuss how the general theory might be extended to other parameters of reinforcement (e.g., magnitude, quality), other means to suppress target or alternative behavior (e.g., satiation, punishment, differential reinforcement of other behavior), and other factors (e.g., non- contingent versus contingent alternative reinforcement, serial alternative reinforcement, and multiple schedules).

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalModels, PsychologicalReinforcement ScheduleBehavioral momentumChoiceExtinctionMatching lawRelative valueResurgence

Identifiers

PMID27794452
PMCPMC5406271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.