Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793822›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2017

Differences in Abundances of Total Vibrio spp., V. vulnificus, and V. parahaemolyticus in Clams and Oysters in North Carolina.

B A Froelich, B Phippen, P Fowler, R T Noble, J D Oliver

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Resource diversity disturbs marineEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Fine-Scale Structuring of PlanktonicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Rapid detection ofRSC advances · 2021
    Article
  10. Hazard Identification Related to the Presence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Disentangling the abundance and structure ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay: OperationalApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Spatial Heterogeneity ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B A FroelichThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA bafroeli@unc.edu.
B PhippenThe University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
P FowlerNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.
R T NobleThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.
J D OliverThe University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · USNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filter feeding shellfish can concentrate pathogenic bacteria, including Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, as much as 100-fold from the overlying water. These shellfish, especially clams and oysters, are often consumed raw, providing a route of entry for concentrated doses of pathogenic bacteria into the human body. The numbers of foodborne infections with these microbes are increasing, and a better understanding of the conditions that might trigger elevated concentrations of these bacteria in seafood is needed. In addition, if bacterial concentrations in water are correlated with those in shellfish, then sampling regimens could be simplified, as water samples can be more rapidly and easily obtained. After sampling of oysters and clams, either simultaneously or separately, for over 2 years, it was concluded that while Vibrio concentrations in oysters and water were related, this was not the case for levels in clams and water. When clams and oysters were collected simultaneously from the same site, the clams were found to have lower Vibrio levels than the oysters. Furthermore, the environmental parameters that were correlated with levels of Vibrio spp. in oysters and water were found to be quite different from those that were correlated with levels of Vibrio spp. in clams. IMPORTANCE: This study shows that clams are a potential source of infection in North Carolina, especially for V. parahaemolyticus These findings also highlight the need for clam-specific environmental research to develop accurate Vibrio abundance models and to broaden the ecological understanding of clam-Vibrio interactions. This is especially relevant as foodborne Vibrio infections from clams are being reported.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyAnimalsBivalviaNorth CarolinaOstreidaeSeawaterShellfishVibrioVibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio vulnificusclamsecologyfoodoystersshellfishVibrio

Identifiers

PMID27793822
PMCPMC5203622
OpenAlexW2541243045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.