Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793797›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2017

Adherence to the WCRF/AICR Dietary Recommendations for Cancer Prevention and Risk of Cancer in Elderly from Europe and the United States: A Meta-Analysis within the CHANCES Project.

Nicole Jankovic, Anouk Geelen, Renate M Winkels, Blaise Mwungura, Veronika Fedirko, Mazda Jenab, Anne K Illner, Hermann Brenner, José M Ordóñez-Mena, Jessica C Kiefte de Jong and 14 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The Impact of Adherence to Cancer Prevention Recommendations on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Cohort of Canadian Adults.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Nicole JankovicDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Nicole.Jankovic@uk-essen.de.
Anouk GeelenDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Renate M WinkelsDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Blaise MwunguraDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Veronika FedirkoDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mazda JenabDepartment Nutritional Epidemiology, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Anne K IllnerDepartment of Nutrition & Health Sciences, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, Beauvais, France.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
José M Ordóñez-MenaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jessica C Kiefte de JongDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Oscar H FrancoDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Philippos OrfanosDepartment of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Antonia TrichopoulouDepartment of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Paolo BoffettaHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Antonio AgudoUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Petra H PeetersDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne TjønnelandDanish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Göran HallmansDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
H Bas Bueno-de-MesquitaDepartment for Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Yikyung ParkDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Edith J FeskensDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette C de GrootDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ellen KampmanDepartment Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Consortium on Health and Ageing: Network of Cohorts in Europe and the United States (CHANCES)

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unknown whether dietary recommendations for cancer prevention are applicable to the elderly. We analyzed WCRF/AICR recommendations in cohorts of European and U.S. adults ages 60 years and above.

methodsIndividual participant data meta-analysis included 362,114 participants (43% women), from seven prospective cohort studies, free from cancer at enrollment. The WCRF/AICR diet score was based on: (i) energy-dense foods and sugary drinks, (ii) plant foods, (iii) red and processed meat, and (iv) alcoholic drinks. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between the diet score and cancer risks. Adjusted, cohort-specific HRs were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk advancement periods (RAP) were calculated to quantify the time period by which the risk of cancer was postponed among those adhering to the recommendations.

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 11 to 15 years across cohorts, 70,877 cancer cases were identified. Each one-point increase in the WCRF/AICR diet score [range, 0 (no) to 4 (complete adherence)] was significantly associated with a lower risk of total cancer [HR, 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.92-0.97], cancers of the colorectum (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.89) and prostate (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97), but not breast or lung. Adherence to an additional component of the WCRF/AICR diet score significantly postponed the incidence of cancer at any site by 1.6 years (RAP, -1.6; 95% CI, -4.09 to -2.16).

conclusionsAdherence to WCRF/AICR dietary recommendations is associated with lower risk of cancer among older adults. IMPACT: Dietary recommendations for cancer prevention are applicable to the elderly. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 136-44. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAgingEuropeFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLife StyleMaleNeoplasmsNutrition AssessmentPrevalencePrimary PreventionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27793797
PMCPMC5225095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.