Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793434›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2016

Psychobiotics and the Manipulation of Bacteria-Gut-Brain Signals.

Amar Sarkar, Soili M Lehto, Siobhán Harty, Timothy G Dinan, John F Cryan, Philip W J Burnet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04366401 (Efficacy of Dietary Modulation With High Prebiotic and Probiotic Content on Nutritional and Metabolic Status in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 474 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
474citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04366401 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Dietary Modulation With High Prebiotic and Probiotic Content on Nutritional and Metabolic Status in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de CórdobaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsSchizophrenia and Related Disorders, Diet HabitArmsConventional Dietary Advice, Prebiotic/Probiotic Dietary Modulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

474 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Microbiome and well-being: a meta-analysis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Effects ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Effects of Heat-TreatedNutrients · 2024
    Trial

414 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amar SarkarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
Soili M LehtoInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Siobhán HartyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
Timothy G DinanDepartment of Psychiatry, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
John F CryanDepartment of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Philip W J BurnetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. Electronic address: phil.burnet@psych.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychobiotics were previously defined as live bacteria (probiotics) which, when ingested, confer mental health benefits through interactions with commensal gut bacteria. We expand this definition to encompass prebiotics, which enhance the growth of beneficial gut bacteria. We review probiotic and prebiotic effects on emotional, cognitive, systemic, and neural variables relevant to health and disease. We discuss gut-brain signalling mechanisms enabling psychobiotic effects, such as metabolite production. Overall, knowledge of how the microbiome responds to exogenous influence remains limited. We tabulate several important research questions and issues, exploration of which will generate both mechanistic insights and facilitate future psychobiotic development. We suggest the definition of psychobiotics be expanded beyond probiotics and prebiotics to include other means of influencing the microbiome.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainEmotionsGastrointestinal TractHumansMicrobiotaPrebioticsProbioticsPrebioticsgut–brain axisinterkingdom signallingmicrobiomemicrobiotaprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID27793434
PMCPMC5102282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.