Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793206›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2016

MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome.

Sven Jarius, Klemens Ruprecht, Ingo Kleiter, Nadja Borisow, Nasrin Asgari, Kalliopi Pitarokoili, Florence Pache, Oliver Stich, Lena-Alexandra Beume, Martin W Hümmert and 21 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03345537 (Observational Prospective Multicentered Study Evaluating Initial Clinical Presentation of Inflammatory Optic Neuritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 377 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
377citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
61.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03345537 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Observational Prospective Multicentered Study Evaluating Initial Clinical Presentation of Inflammatory Optic Neuritis (ON) Associated or Not With Autoantibodies Anti- Myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG-Ab)

TypeobservationalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled103ConditionsOptic NeuritisArmsNon interventional study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

377 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 881 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Movement Disorders in MOGAD: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A meta-analysis comparing first-line immunosuppressants in neuromyelitis optica.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  15. MOGAD Is the Most Common Cause of Isolated Optic Neuritis in Children.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

317 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Sven JariusMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Klemens RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ingo KleiterDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Nadja BorisowNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Nasrin AsgariDepartment of Neurology and Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kalliopi PitarokoiliDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Florence PacheNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver StichDepartment of Neurology, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany.
Lena-Alexandra BeumeDepartment of Neurology, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin W HümmertDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Marius RingelsteinDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Corinna TrebstDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Alexander WinkelmannDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Alexander SchwarzMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mathias ButtmannDepartment of Neurology, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany.
Hanna ZimmermannDepartment of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Joseph KuchlingDepartment of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Diego FranciottaIRCCS, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy.
Marco CapobiancoCentro di Riferimento Regionale SM, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
Eberhard SiebertDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité University Medicine - Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carsten LukasDepartment of Neuroradiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Mirjam Korporal-KuhnkeMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen HaasMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kai FechnerInstitute of Experimental Immunolog, affiliated to Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Alexander U BrandtDepartment of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kathrin SchandaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Orhan AktasDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Friedemann PaulNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Markus ReindlDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Brigitte WildemannMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
in cooperation with the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)
Heidelberg University · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEFondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · ITUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKEuroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DEOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA subset of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) has been shown to be seropositive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG).

objectiveTo describe the epidemiological, clinical, radiological, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and electrophysiological features of a large cohort of MOG-IgG-positive patients with optic neuritis (ON) and/or myelitis (n = 50) as well as attack and long-term treatment outcomes.

methodsRetrospective multicenter study.

resultsThe sex ratio was 1:2.8 (m:f). Median age at onset was 31 years (range 6-70). The disease followed a multiphasic course in 80 % (median time-to-first-relapse 5 months; annualized relapse rate 0.92) and resulted in significant disability in 40 % (mean follow-up 75 ± 46.5 months), with severe visual impairment or functional blindness (36 %) and markedly impaired ambulation due to paresis or ataxia (25 %) as the most common long-term sequelae. Functional blindess in one or both eyes was noted during at least one ON attack in around 70 %. Perioptic enhancement was present in several patients. Besides acute tetra-/paraparesis, dysesthesia and pain were common in acute myelitis (70 %). Longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions were frequent, but short lesions occurred at least once in 44 %. Fourty-one percent had a history of simultaneous ON and myelitis. Clinical or radiological involvement of the brain, brainstem, or cerebellum was present in 50 %; extra-opticospinal symptoms included intractable nausea and vomiting and respiratory insufficiency (fatal in one). CSF pleocytosis (partly neutrophilic) was present in 70 %, oligoclonal bands in only 13 %, and blood-CSF-barrier dysfunction in 32 %. Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and long-term immunosuppression were often effective; however, treatment failure leading to rapid accumulation of disability was noted in many patients as well as flare-ups after steroid withdrawal. Full recovery was achieved by plasma exchange in some cases, including after IVMP failure. Breakthrough attacks under azathioprine were linked to the drug-specific latency period and a lack of cotreatment with oral steroids. Methotrexate was effective in 5/6 patients. Interferon-beta was associated with ongoing or increasing disease activity. Rituximab and ofatumumab were effective in some patients. However, treatment with rituximab was followed by early relapses in several cases; end-of-dose relapses occurred 9-12 months after the first infusion. Coexisting autoimmunity was rare (9 %). Wingerchuk's 2006 and 2015 criteria for NMO(SD) and Barkhof and McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) were met by 28 %, 32 %, 15 %, 33 %, respectively; MS had been suspected in 36 %. Disease onset or relapses were preceded by infection, vaccination, or pregnancy/delivery in several cases.

conclusionOur findings from a predominantly Caucasian cohort strongly argue against the concept of MOG-IgG denoting a mild and usually monophasic variant of NMOSD. The predominantly relapsing and often severe disease course and the short median time to second attack support the use of prophylactic long-term treatments in patients with MOG-IgG-positive ON and/or myelitis.

Indexed as

Neuromyelitis OpticaTreatment OutcomeAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesBrainCardiolipinsChildCohort StudiesFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesCardiolipinsMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinAquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG, NMO-IgG)AutoantibodiesAzathioprineBarkhof criteriaCerebrospinal fluidElectrophysiologyEvoked potentialsGlatiramer acetateInfectionsInterferon betaInternational consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersIPND criteriaLongitudinally extensive transverse myelitisMagnetic resonance imagingMcDonald criteriaMethotrexateMultiple sclerosisMyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG)NatalizumabNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD)OfatumumabOligoclonal bandsOptic neuritisOutcomePregnancyRituximabTherapyTransverse myelitisTreatmentVaccinationWingerchuk criteria 2006 and 2015

Identifiers

PMID27793206
PMCPMC5086042
OpenAlexW2542372902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.