Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793150›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines.

E L Mc Goldrick, T Crawford, J A Brown, K M Groom, C A Crowther

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03725774 (The SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03725774 nacompletednot on this map

The SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeresa Moreno CasbasRan2016 to 2017Enrolled300ConditionsAge ProblemArmsGRIP (Getting Research into Practice) model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. SUMAMOS EXCELENCIAHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E L Mc GoldrickLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
T CrawfordLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
J A BrownLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
K M GroomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
C A CrowtherLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. c.crowther@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ineffective implementation of evidence based practice guidelines can mean that the best health outcomes are not achieved. This study examined the barriers and enablers to the uptake and implementation of the new bi-national (Australia and New Zealand) antenatal corticosteroid clinical practice guidelines among health professionals, using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

methodsSemi-structured interviews or online questionnaires were conducted across four health professional groups and three district health boards in Auckland, New Zealand. The questions were constructed to reflect the 14 behavioural domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework. Relevant domains were identified by the presence of conflicting beliefs within a domain; the frequency of beliefs; and the likely strength of the impact of a belief on the behaviour using thematic analysis. The influence of health professional group and organisation on the different barriers and enablers identified were explored.

resultsSeventy-three health professionals completed either a semi-structured interview (n = 35) or on-line questionnaire (n = 38). Seven behavioural domains were identified as overarching enablers: belief about consequences; knowledge; social influences; environmental context and resource; belief about capabilities; social professional role and identity; and behavioural regulation. Five behavioural domains were identified as overarching barriers: environmental context and resources; knowledge; social influences; belief about consequences; and social professional role and identity. Differences in beliefs between individual health professional groups were identified within the domains: belief about consequences; social professional role and identity; and emotion. Organisational differences were identified within the domains: belief about consequences; social influences; and belief about capabilities.

conclusionThis study has identified some of the enablers and barriers to implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines using the validated Theoretical Domains Framework, as perceived by health professionals. We have identified differences between individual health professional groups and organisations. The identification of these behavioural determinants can be used to enhance an implementation strategy, assist in the design of interventions to achieve improved implementation and facilitate process evaluations to understand why or how change interventions are effective.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandOrganizational InnovationPerceptionAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntenatal corticosteroidsClinical practice guidelinesImplementationTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID27793150
PMCPMC5084422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.