ArticleBMC cancer2016
Living well after breast cancer randomized controlled trial protocol: evaluating a telephone-delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care in women following treatment for breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of dietetic care for cancer survivors in the primary care setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying the effective behaviour change techniques in nutrition and physical activity interventions for the treatment of overweight/obesity in post-treatment breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Strategies for screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care and other community settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Optimising weight-loss interventions in cancer patients-A systematic review and network meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Body weight management in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Eating frequency, timing of meals, and sleep duration before and after a randomized controlled weight loss trial for breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Trial
- Effect of a Remotely Delivered Weight Loss Intervention in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2021Trial
- Adopting machine learning to predict breast cancer patients adherence with lifestyle recommendations and quality of life outcomes.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Access to nutrition services and information after active cancer treatment: a mixed methods study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Review Article a Multidisciplinary Evaluation for Advanced Supportive Care of Breast Cancer Patients.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Systematic Identification of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care-A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Variability and limitations in home-based exercise program descriptions in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- Virtual care models for cancer survivorship.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Review
- An observational mixed-methods approach to investigate the fear of cancer recurrence cognitive and emotional model by Lee-JonesEcancermedicalscience · 2019Article
- Dietary Guidelines for Breast Cancer Patients: A Critical Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Review
- Telerehabilitation and Monitoring Physical Activity in Patient with Breast Cancer: Systematic Review.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity, physical inactivity and poor diet quality have been associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality as well as treatment-related side-effects in breast cancer survivors. Weight loss intervention trials in breast cancer survivors have shown that weight loss is safe and achievable; however, few studies have examined the benefits of such interventions on a broad range of outcomes and few have examined factors important to translation (e.g. feasible delivery method for scaling up, assessment of sustained changes, cost-effectiveness). The Living Well after Breast Cancer randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate a 12-month telephone-delivered weight loss intervention (versus usual care) on weight change and a range of secondary outcomes including cost-effectiveness. METHODS/
designWomen (18-75 years; body mass index 25-45 kg/m DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence needed to inform the wide-scale provision of weight loss, physical activity and dietary interventions as part of routine survivorship care for breast cancer survivors.
trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12612000997853 (Registered 18 September 2012).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.