Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793098›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2016

'Proactive' use of cue-context congruence for building reinforcement learning's reward function.

Judit Zsuga, Klara Biro, Gabor Tajti, Magdolna Emma Szilasi, Csaba Papp, Bela Juhasz, Rudolf Gesztelyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mesocorticolimbic and Cardiometabolic Diseases-Two Faces of the Same Coin?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Evaluation of the Relationships between Irisin Levels and Cognitive Functions in Individuals with Schizophrenia.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Irisin in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Judit ZsugaDepartment of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary. zsuga.judit@med.unideb.hu.
Klara BiroDepartment of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary.
Gabor TajtiDepartment of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary.
Magdolna Emma SzilasiDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary.
Csaba PappDepartment of Health Systems Management and Quality Management for Health Care, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary.
Bela JuhaszDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary.
Rudolf GesztelyiDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReinforcement learning is a fundamental form of learning that may be formalized using the Bellman equation. Accordingly an agent determines the state value as the sum of immediate reward and of the discounted value of future states. Thus the value of state is determined by agent related attributes (action set, policy, discount factor) and the agent's knowledge of the environment embodied by the reward function and hidden environmental factors given by the transition probability. The central objective of reinforcement learning is to solve these two functions outside the agent's control either using, or not using a model.

resultsIn the present paper, using the proactive model of reinforcement learning we offer insight on how the brain creates simplified representations of the environment, and how these representations are organized to support the identification of relevant stimuli and action. Furthermore, we identify neurobiological correlates of our model by suggesting that the reward and policy functions, attributes of the Bellman equitation, are built by the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), respectively.

conclusionsBased on this we propose that the OFC assesses cue-context congruence to activate the most context frame. Furthermore given the bidirectional neuroanatomical link between the OFC and model-free structures, we suggest that model-based input is incorporated into the reward prediction error (RPE) signal, and conversely RPE signal may be used to update the reward-related information of context frames and the policy underlying action selection in the OFC and ACC, respectively. Furthermore clinical implications for cognitive behavioral interventions are discussed.

Indexed as

CuesModels, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalRewardAnimalsAssociationCerebral CortexHumansBellman equationCue-context congruenceModel-based reinforcement learningPolicy functionProactive brainReward function

Identifiers

PMID27793098
PMCPMC5086043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.