Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793096›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by Lactobacillus isolated from fine cocoa.

Tauá Alves Melo, Thalis Ferreira Dos Santos, Milena Evangelista de Almeida, Luiz Alberto Gusmão Fontes Junior, Ewerton Ferraz Andrade, Rachel Passos Rezende, Lucas Miranda Marques, Carla Cristina Romano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibacterial Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential of Fermented Food-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. ESKAPEE Pathogen Biofilm Control on Surfaces with ProbioticAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tauá Alves MeloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University, Ilhéus-Itabuna Road, km 16 Salobrinho, Ilhéus, 45662-900, Bahia State, Brazil.
Thalis Ferreira Dos SantosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University, Ilhéus-Itabuna Road, km 16 Salobrinho, Ilhéus, 45662-900, Bahia State, Brazil.
Milena Evangelista de AlmeidaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University, Ilhéus-Itabuna Road, km 16 Salobrinho, Ilhéus, 45662-900, Bahia State, Brazil.
Luiz Alberto Gusmão Fontes JuniorDepartment of Biological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University, Ilhéus-Itabuna Road, km 16 Salobrinho, Ilhéus, 45662-900, Bahia State, Brazil.
Ewerton Ferraz AndradeMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Rio de Contas Street, Candeiasn 17,58 Block, Vitória da Conquista, 45029-094, Bahia State, Brazil.
Rachel Passos RezendeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University, Ilhéus-Itabuna Road, km 16 Salobrinho, Ilhéus, 45662-900, Bahia State, Brazil.
Lucas Miranda MarquesMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Rio de Contas Street, Candeiasn 17,58 Block, Vitória da Conquista, 45029-094, Bahia State, Brazil.
Carla Cristina RomanoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University, Ilhéus-Itabuna Road, km 16 Salobrinho, Ilhéus, 45662-900, Bahia State, Brazil. romanocc@uol.com.br.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofilm production represents an important virulence and pathogenesis factor for Staphylococcus aureus. The formation of biofilms on medical devices is a major concern in hospital environments, as they can become a constant source of infection. Probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus fermentum and L. plantarum, have been found to inhibit biofilm formation; however little is known about the underlying mechanism. In this study, we tested the activity of supernatants produced by L. fermentum TCUESC01 and L. plantarum TCUESC02, isolated during the fermentation of fine cocoa, against S. aureus CCMB262 biofilm production. We measured inhibition of biofilm formation in vitro and analyzed biofilm structure by confocal and electronic microscopy. Additionally, we quantified the expression of S. aureus genes icaA and icaR involved in the synthesis of the biofilm matrix by real-time PCR.

resultsBoth Lactobacillus supernatants inhibited S. aureus growth. However, only L. fermentum TCUESC01 significantly reduced the thickness of the biofilm, from 14 μm to 2.83 μm (at 18 mg∙mL

conclusionsL. fermentum TCUESC01 reduces the formation of S. aureus biofilm under subinhibitory conditions. Inhibition of biofilm production probably depends on modulation of the ica operon.

Indexed as

AntibiosisBiofilmsChocolateCulture MediaFermentationLactiplantibacillus plantarumLactobacillusLimosilactobacillus fermentumMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhenotypePolystyrenesProbioticsStaphylococcus aureusCulture MediaPolystyrenesAntistaphylococcalBiofilmicaLactobacillus fermentumProbiotic properties

Identifiers

PMID27793096
PMCPMC5084336
OpenAlexW2539584865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.