Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27793023›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.

Matteo Ferro, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Dario Bruzzese, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Sisto Perdonà, Riccardo Autorino, Francesco Cantiello, Roberto La Rocca, Gian Maria Busetto, Amelia Cimmino and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo FerroDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe LucarelliDepartment of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Dario BruzzeseDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe Di LorenzoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Sisto PerdonàDepartment of Urology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - IRCCS", Naples, Italy.
Riccardo AutorinoUniversity Hospitals Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Francesco CantielloDivision of Urology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberto La RoccaDepartment of Urology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Amelia CimminoInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics "A. Buzzati Traverso", National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
Carlo BuonerbaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Michele BattagliaDepartment of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Rocco DamianoDivision of Urology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Ottavio De CobelliDepartment of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo MironeDepartment of Urology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Daniela TerraccianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITRipamonti · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is currently a widely accepted treatment option for men with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Several reports have highlighted the association of low serum testosterone levels with high-grade, high-stage PCa. However, the impact of serum testosterone as a predictor of progression in men with low-risk PCa has been little assessed.In this study, we evaluated the association of circulating testosterone concentrations with a staging/grading reclassification in a cohort of low-risk PCa patients meeting the inclusion criteria for the AS protocol but opting for radical prostatectomy.Radical prostatectomy (RP) was performed in 338 patients, eligible for AS according to the following criteria: clinical stage T2a or less, PSA<10ng/ml, two or fewer cancer cores, Gleason score (GS)≤6 and PSA density<0.2 ng/mL/cc. Reclassification was defined as upstaging (stage>pT2) and upgrading (GS≥7; primary Gleason pattern 4) disease. Unfavorable disease was defined as the occurrence of pathological stage>pT2 and predominant Gleason score 4. Total testosterone was measured before surgery.Low serum testosterone levels (<300 ng/dL) were significantly associated with upgrading, upstaging, unfavorable disease and positive surgical margins. The addition of testosterone to a base model, including age, PSA, PSA density, clinical stage and positive cancer involvement in cores, showed a significant independent influence of this variable on upstaging, upgrading and unfavorable disease.In conclusion, our results support the idea that total testosterone should be a selection criterion for inclusion of low-risk PCa patients in AS programs and suggest that testosterone level less than 300 ng/dL should be considered a discouraging factor when a close AS program is considered as treatment option.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingAgedDisease ProgressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTestosteroneTestosteroneactive surveillanceprostate cancertestosteroneupgradingupstaging

Identifiers

PMID27793023
PMCPMC5392340
OpenAlexW2538218699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.