Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27792836›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of the antipyretic effect of intravenous paracetamol in patients admitted to hospital with infection.

Thomas Tsaganos, Ioulia K Tseti, Nikolaos Tziolos, Georgios-Stefanos Soumelas, Marina Koupetori, Athina Pyrpasopoulou, Karolina Akinosoglou, Charalambos Gogos, Nikolaos Tsokos, Asterios Karagiannis and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas Tsaganos4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Ioulia K TsetiUni-Pharma S.A., Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos Tziolos4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Georgios-Stefanos SoumelasUni-Pharma S.A., Athens, Greece.
Marina Koupetori1st Department of Internal Medicine, Thriasio Elefsis General Hospital, Greece.
Athina Pyrpasopoulou2nd Department of Propedeutic Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Greece.
Karolina AkinosoglouDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, Medical School, Greece.
Charalambos GogosDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, Medical School, Greece.
Nikolaos TsokosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chalkida General Hospital, Greece.
Asterios Karagiannis2nd Department of Propedeutic Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Greece.
Styliani Sympardi1st Department of Internal Medicine, Thriasio Elefsis General Hospital, Greece.
Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis4th Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRThriasio General Hospital of Elefsina · GRUni Pharma (Greece) · GRUniversity of Patras · GRGeneral Hospital of Attica · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimNo randomized study has been conducted to investigate the use of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen, APAP) for the management of fever due to infection. The present study evaluated a new ready-made infusion of paracetamol.

methodsEighty patients with a body temperature onset ≥38.5°C in the previous 24 h due to infection were randomized to a single administration of placebo (n = 39) or 1 g paracetamol (n = 41), and their temperature was recorded at standard intervals. Rescue medication with 1 g paracetamol was allowed. Serum samples were collected for the measurement of APAP and its metabolites. The primary endpoint was defervescence, defined as a core temperature ≤37.1°C.

resultsDuring the first 6 h, defervescence was achieved in 15 (38.5%) patients treated with placebo compared with 33 (80.5%) patients treated with paracetamol 1 g (P < 0.0001). The median time to defervescence with paracetamol 1 g was 3 h. Rescue medication was given to 15 (38.5%) and five (12.2%) patients allocated to placebo and paracetamol, respectively (P = 0.007); nine (60.0%) and two (40.0%) of these patients, respectively, experienced defervescence. No further antipyretic medication was needed for patients becoming afebrile with rescue medication. Serum glucuronide-APAP concentrations were significantly greater in the serum of patients who did not experience defervescence with paracetamol. The efficacy of paracetamol was not affected by serum creatinine. No drug-related adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThe 1 g paracetamol formulation has a rapid and sustainable antipyretic effect on fever due to infection. Its efficacy is dependent on hepatic metabolism.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdministration, IntravenousAdultAgedAntipyreticsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFeverFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcetaminophenAntipyreticsfeverhepatic metabolismparacetamol

Identifiers

PMID27792836
PMCPMC5346867
OpenAlexW2545491899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.