ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2018
An integrated theoretical-experimental approach to accelerate translational tissue engineering.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A combined experimental and computational framework to evaluate the behavior of therapeutic cells for peripheral nerve regeneration.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022Article
- Design considerations for engineering 3D models to study vascular pathologies in vitro.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Review
- Modelling-informed cell-seeded nerve repair construct designs for treating peripheral nerve injuries.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Regenerative medicine meets mathematical modelling: developing symbiotic relationships.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- CombiningJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Strategies for Peripheral Nerve Repair.Current tissue microenvironment reports · 2020Review
- Vascularization Strategies for Peripheral Nerve Tissue Engineering.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2018Review
- Polymeric 3D Printed Structures for Soft-Tissue Engineering.Journal of applied polymer science · 2018Article
- An integrated theoretical-experimental approach to accelerate translational tissue engineering.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018Article
- Modelling multi-scale cell-tissue interaction of tissue-engineered muscle constructs.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implantable devices utilizing bioengineered tissue are increasingly showing promise as viable clinical solutions. The design of bioengineered constructs is currently directed according to the results of experiments that are used to test a wide range of different combinations and spatial arrangements of biomaterials, cells and chemical factors. There is an outstanding need to accelerate the design process and reduce financial costs, whilst minimizing the required number of animal-based experiments. These aims could be achieved through the incorporation of mathematical modelling as a preliminary design tool. Here we focus on tissue-engineered constructs for peripheral nerve repair, which are designed to aid nerve and blood vessel growth and repair after peripheral nerve injury. We offer insight into the role that mathematical modelling can play within tissue engineering, and motivate the use of modelling as a tool capable of improving and accelerating the design of nerve repair constructs in particular. Specific case studies are presented in order to illustrate the potential of mathematical modelling to direct construct design. Copyright © 2016 The Authors Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.