ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2017
Reoperative endoscopic endonasal surgery for residual or recurrent pituitary adenomas.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent/residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Assessment of multimodal treatment options in recurrent and persistent acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Reported outcomes in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.Pituitary · 2023Pooled it
- Double pituitary adenomas are most commonly associated with GH- and ACTH-secreting tumors: systematic review of the literature.Pituitary · 2017Pooled it
- Endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent or residual pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Clinical and surgical outcomes of pediatric Cushing's disease following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Association between transcription factors expression and growth patterns of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cost outcomes of pituitary adenoma resection: The use of a hybrid microscopic/endoscopic surgery.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Repeat endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for residual or recurrent Cushing's disease: safety, feasibility, and success.Pituitary · 2024Article
- Comparing redo surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent, residual, and/or tumors showing progression in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2024Review
- Cystic versus non-cystic silent corticotrophic adenomas: clinical and histological analysis of 62 cases after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery-a retrospective, single-center study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022Article
- Effects of Staged Nursing Care on Neuroendoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection and Postoperative Complications.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Outcome of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Recurrent or Residual Pituitary Adenomas and Comparison to Non-Recurrent or Residual Cohort by Propensity Score Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Clinical relevance of tumor consistency in pituitary adenoma.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2021Review
- Differential independent impact of the intraoperative use of navigation and angled endoscopes on the surgical outcome of endonasal endoscopy for pituitary tumors: a prospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2021Article
- Comparative study of complications after primary and revision transsphenoidal endoscopic surgeries.Neurosurgical review · 2021Article
- Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography for resection of pituitary adenomas: a comparative retrospective study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- The outcome of TSHoma from a tertiary care institute in India.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Association of NM23 polymorphisms and clinicopathological features and recurrence of invasive pituitary adenomas.Pituitary · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Regrowth of the lesion after surgical removal of pituitary adenomas is uncommon unless subtotal resection was originally achieved in the first surgery. Treatment for recurrent tumor can involve surgery or radiotherapy. Locations of residual tumor may vary based on the original approach. The authors evaluated the specific sites of residual or recurrent tumor after different transsphenoidal approaches and describe the surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal reoperation. METHODS The authors analyzed a prospectively collected database of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal surgeries for residual or recurrent pituitary adenomas after an original transsphenoidal microscopic or endoscopic surgery. The site of the recurrent tumor and outcome after reoperation were noted and correlated with the primary surgical approach. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables between surgical groups. RESULTS Forty-one patients underwent surgery for residual/recurrent pituitary adenoma from 2004 to 2015 at Weill Cornell Medical College. The previous treatment was a transsphenoidal microscopic (n = 22) and endoscopic endonasal (n = 19) surgery. In 83.3% patients (n = 30/36) there was postoperative residual tumor after the initial surgery. A residual tumor following endonasal endoscopic surgery was less common in the sphenoid sinus (10.5%; 2/19) than it was after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (72.7%; n =16/22; p = 0.004). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 58.5%, and either GTR or near-total resection was achieved in 92.7%. Across all cases, the average extent of resection was 93.7%. The rate of GTR was lower in patients with Knosp-Steiner Grade 3-4 invasion (p < 0.0005). Postoperative CSF leak was seen in only one case (2.4%), which stopped with lumbar drainage. Visual fields improved in 52.9% (n = 9/17) of patients and were stable in 47% (n = 8/17). Endocrine remission was achieved in 77.8% (n = 14/18) of cases, 12 by surgery alone and 2 by adjuvant medical (n = 1) and radiation (n = 1) therapy. New diabetes insipidus occurred in 4.9% (n = 2/41) of patients-in one of whom an additional single anterior hormonal axis was compromised-and 9.7% (n = 4/41) of patients had a new anterior pituitary hormonal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS Endonasal endoscopic reoperation is extremely effective at removing recurrent or residual pituitary adenomas that remain after a prior surgery, and it may be preferable to radiation therapy particularly in symptomatic patients. Achievement of GTR is less common when lateral cavernous sinus invasion is present. The locations of residual/recurrent tumor were more likely sphenoidal and parasellar following a prior microscopic transsphenoidal surgery and sellar following a prior endonasal endoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27791524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.