Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791451›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2016

CCR5 receptor antagonists in preclinical to phase II clinical development for treatment of HIV.

Michelle B Kim, Kyle E Giesler, Yesim A Tahirovic, Valarie M Truax, Dennis C Liotta, Lawrence J Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chemokines and chemokine receptors during COVID-19 infection.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The human tissue-resident CCR5Science translational medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Inhibition of the CCL5/CCR5 Axis against the Progression of Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle B Kima Department of Chemistry , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Kyle E Gieslera Department of Chemistry , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Yesim A Tahirovica Department of Chemistry , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Valarie M Truaxa Department of Chemistry , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Dennis C Liottaa Department of Chemistry , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Lawrence J Wilsona Department of Chemistry , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

NONCARBOHYDRATE APPROACHES TO ANTIAIDS NUCLEOSIDESR01AI028731 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LIOTTA, DENNIS C · 1989 to 2017
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI028731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe chemokine receptor CCR5 has garnered significant attention in recent years as a target to treat HIV infection largely due to the approval and success of the drug Maraviroc. The side effects and inefficiencies with other first generation agents led to failed clinical trials, prompting the development of newer CCR5 antagonists. Areas covered: This review aims to survey the current status of 'next generation' CCR5 antagonists in the preclinical pipeline with an emphasis on emerging agents for the treatment of HIV infection. These efforts have culminated in the identification of advanced second-generation agents to reach the clinic and the dual CCR5/CCR2 antagonist Cenicriviroc as the most advanced currently in phase II clinical studies. Expert opinion: The clinical success of CCR5 inhibitors for treatment of HIV infection has rested largely on studies of Maraviroc and a second-generation dual CCR5/CCR2 antagonist Cenicriviroc. Although research efforts identified several promising preclinical candidates, these were dropped during early clinical studies. Despite patient access to Maraviroc, there is insufficient enthusiasm surrounding its use as front-line therapy for treatment of HIV. The non-HIV infection related development activities for Maraviroc and Cenicriviroc may help drive future interests.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsCCR5 Receptor AntagonistsCyclohexanesDrug DesignHIV InfectionsHumansImidazolesMaravirocSulfoxidesTriazolesAnti-HIV AgentsCCR5 Receptor AntagonistscenicrivirocCyclohexanesImidazolesMaravirocSulfoxidesTriazolesantagonistsCCR2CCR5Cenicrivirocchemokine receptorsCXCR4entry inhibitorsHIVMaraviroc

Identifiers

PMID27791451
PMCPMC5776690
OpenAlexW2541409894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.