Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791385›Full record

ReviewFuture cardiology2016

Novel cardioprotective and regenerative therapies in acute myocardial infarction: a review of recent and ongoing clinical trials.

Nicholas B Spath, Nicholas L Mills, Nicholas L Cruden

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas B SpathCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nicholas L MillsCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nicholas L CrudenEdinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/10/024/28266British Heart Foundation FS/16/14/32023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the original large-scale randomized trials of aspirin and β-blockade, there have been a number of major advances in pharmacological and mechanical treatments for acute myocardial infarction. Despite this progress, myocardial infarction remains a major global cause of mortality and morbidity, driving a quest for novel treatments in this area. As the understanding of mitochondrial dynamics and the pathophysiology of reperfusion injury has evolved, the last three decades have seen advances in ischemic conditioning, pharmacological and metabolic cardioprotection, as well as biological and stem-cell therapies. The aim of this review is to provide a synopsis of adjunctive cardioprotective and regenerative therapies currently undergoing or entering early clinical trials in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Cardiotonic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansHypothermia, InducedIschemic PostconditioningIschemic PreconditioningMyocardial InfarctionStem Cell TransplantationCardiotonic Agentscoolingischemia-reperfusion injuryischemic conditioningmyocardial infarctionpharmacological conditioningprimary percutaneous coronary interventionstem-cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID27791385
PMCPMC5985502
OpenAlexW2545900758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.