Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791330›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2017

Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.

Katherine K Coady, Ronald C Biever, Nancy D Denslow, Melanie Gross, Patrick D Guiney, Henrik Holbech, Natalie K Karouna-Renier, Ioanna Katsiadaki, Hank Krueger, Steven L Levine and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Integrating network analysis and machine learning to elucidate chemical-induced pancreatic toxicity in zebrafish embryos.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The EDCMET Project: Metabolic Effects of Endocrine Disruptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Harvesting the promise of AOPs: An assessment and recommendations.The Science of the total environment · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katherine K CoadyThe Dow Chemical Company, Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, Midland, Michigan, USA.
Ronald C BieverSmithers Viscient Laboratories, Wareham, Massachusetts, USA.
Nancy D DenslowDepartment of Physiological Sciences and Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Melanie Grosswca, Faringdon, United Kingdom.
Patrick D GuineyMolecular and Environmental Toxicology Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Henrik HolbechDepartment of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Natalie K Karouna-RenierUSGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Beltsville, Maryland.
Ioanna KatsiadakiCentre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Dorset, United Kingdom.
Hank KruegerWildlife International, Division of EAG Laboratories, Easton, Maryland, USA.
Steven L LevineGlobal Regulatory Sciences, Monsanto Company, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gerd MaackGerman Environment Agency, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
Mike WilliamsCSIRO Land and Water, South Australia, Australia.
Jeffrey C WolfExperimental Pathology Laboratories, Sterling, Virginia, USA.
Gerald T AnkleyUS Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, existing regulatory frameworks and test systems for assessing potential endocrine active chemicals are described, and associated challenges are discussed, along with proposed approaches to address these challenges. Regulatory frameworks vary somewhat across geographies, but all basically evaluate whether a chemical possesses endocrine activity and whether this activity can result in adverse outcomes either to humans or to the environment. Current test systems include in silico, in vitro, and in vivo techniques focused on detecting potential endocrine activity, and in vivo tests that collect apical data to detect possible adverse effects. These test systems are currently designed to robustly assess endocrine activity and/or adverse effects in the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid hormone signaling pathways; however, there are some limitations of current test systems for evaluating endocrine hazard and risk. These limitations include a lack of certainty regarding: 1) adequately sensitive species and life stages; 2) mechanistic endpoints that are diagnostic for endocrine pathways of concern; and 3) the linkage between mechanistic responses and apical, adverse outcomes. Furthermore, some existing test methods are resource intensive with regard to time, cost, and use of animals. However, based on recent experiences, there are opportunities to improve approaches to and guidance for existing test methods and to reduce uncertainty. For example, in vitro high-throughput screening could be used to prioritize chemicals for testing and provide insights as to the most appropriate assays for characterizing hazard and risk. Other recommendations include adding endpoints for elucidating connections between mechanistic effects and adverse outcomes, identifying potentially sensitive taxa for which test methods currently do not exist, and addressing key endocrine pathways of possible concern in addition to those associated with estrogen, androgen, and thyroid signaling. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:302-316. © 2016 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyAnimalsBiological AssayEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsHumansRisk AssessmentToxicity TestsEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsEndocrine disruptionHigh-throughput assaysRegulatory testsRisk and hazard assessment

Identifiers

PMID27791330
PMCPMC6059567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.