Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791205›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Intracellular STING inactivation sensitizes breast cancer cells to genotoxic agents.

Julie Gaston, Laura Cheradame, Vanessa Yvonnet, Olivier Deas, Marie-France Poupon, Jean-Gabriel Judde, Stefano Cairo, Vincent Goffin

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The tumor cell-intrinsic cGAS-STING pathway is associated with the high density of CD8Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie GastonInserm, U1151, Institut Necker Enfants Malades (INEM), University Paris Descartes, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France.
Laura CheradameInserm, U1151, Institut Necker Enfants Malades (INEM), University Paris Descartes, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France.
Vanessa YvonnetXenTech, 91000 Evry, France.
Olivier DeasXenTech, 91000 Evry, France.
Marie-France PouponXenTech, 91000 Evry, France.
Jean-Gabriel JuddeXenTech, 91000 Evry, France.
Stefano CairoXenTech, 91000 Evry, France.
Vincent GoffinInserm, U1151, Institut Necker Enfants Malades (INEM), University Paris Descartes, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRInstitut Necker Enfants Malades · FRUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of the IFN/STAT1 pathway is closely associated with drug response and recurrence of breast cancer treated by chemotherapy. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved upstream and downstream of this pathway in order to identify distinct entities that might be manipulated to improve treatment efficacy. Four breast cancer cell lines (T-47D, MCF7, MDA-MB-231 and HBCx-19 established from the eponymous PDX) were treated in vitro with mafosfamide, a DNA damage inducer. In two of these cell lines (MCF7 and HBCx-19), genotoxic treatment upregulated type I IFN expression leading to paracrine activation of IFN/STAT1 signaling pathway after 6-8 days. We show that STING, a well-characterized inducer of IFN in immune cells, is rapidly triggered in MCF7 cells under genotoxic stress and forms nuclear foci that co-localize with phosphorylated IRF-3 and γH2AX. STING silencing abrogated chemotherapy-induced type I IFN production and signaling and potentiated genotoxic treatment efficacy as it promoted cell death extent and delayed cell colony regrowth. Similar results were obtained after silencing PARP12, one selected gene of the IFN/STAT1 pathway fingerprint. In summary, this study provides the first demonstration of STING activation in breast cancer cells. Our data suggest that genotoxic-induced, STING-mediated type I IFN signaling is a cell-intrinsic mechanism of breast cancer cell survival and regrowth.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCyclophosphamideFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInterferonsMCF-7 CellsMembrane ProteinsParacrine CommunicationSignal TransductionSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTING ProteinUp-RegulationCyclophosphamideInterferonsmafosfamideMembrane ProteinsSTAT1 protein, humanSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTING1 protein, humanSTING ProteininterferonPARP12recurrenceSTAT1

Identifiers

PMID27791205
PMCPMC5363581
OpenAlexW2538853726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.