Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791090›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations.

Joshua M Tybur, Yoel Inbar, Lene Aarøe, Pat Barclay, Fiona Kate Barlow, Mícheál de Barra, D Vaughn Becker, Leah Borovoi, Incheol Choi, Jong An Choi and 32 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Italian validation of the body odor disgust scale.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Joshua M TyburDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081BT, The Netherlands; j.m.tybur@vu.nl.
Yoel InbarDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M1C 1A4.
Lene AarøeDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000 C, Denmark.
Pat BarclayDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Fiona Kate BarlowSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia.
Mícheál de BarraInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom.
D Vaughn BeckerHuman Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212.
Leah BorovoiDepartment of Psychology and Education, The Open University, Raanana 4353701, Israel.
Incheol ChoiDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Jong An ChoiCenter for Happiness Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Nathan S ConsedineFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 92019, New Zealand.
Alan ConwaySchool of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Jane Rebecca ConwayInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
Paul ConwayDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32304.
Vera Cubela AdoricDepartment of Psychology, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Dilara Ekin DemirciDepartment of Psychology, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Ana María FernándezEscuela de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, 9170197 Santiago, Chile.
Diogo Conque Seco FerreiraDepartment of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 49100-000 Sergipe, Brazil.
Keiko IshiiDepartment of Psychology, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.
Ivana JakšićInstitute for Educational Research, Belgrade University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Tingting JiDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081BT, The Netherlands.
Florian van LeeuwenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000 C, Denmark.
David M G LewisSchool of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia.
Norman P LiSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903.
Jason C McIntyreInstitute of Psychology, Health, and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, United Kingdom.
Sumitava MukherjeeIndian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380015, India.
Justin H ParkSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.
Boguslaw PawlowskiDepartment of Human Biology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138, Wroclaw, Poland.
Michael Bang PetersenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000 C, Denmark.
David PizarroDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Gerasimos ProdromitisDepartment of Psychology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 176 71, Athens, Greece.
Pavol ProkopDepartment of Biology, Trnava University, 918 43 Trnava, Slovakia.
Markus J RantalaTurku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
Lisa M ReynoldsFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 92019, New Zealand.
Bonifacio SandinFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Bariş SeviDepartment of Psychology, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Delphine De SmetDepartment of Interdisciplinary Study of Law, Private Law, and Business Law, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Narayanan SrinivasanCentre of Behavioural & Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211002, India.
Shruti TewariCentre of Behavioural & Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211002, India.
Cameron WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Jose C YongSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903.
Iris ŽeželjFaculty of Philosophy, Belgrade University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People who are more avoidant of pathogens are more politically conservative, as are nations with greater parasite stress. In the current research, we test two prominent hypotheses that have been proposed as explanations for these relationships. The first, which is an intragroup account, holds that these relationships between pathogens and politics are based on motivations to adhere to local norms, which are sometimes shaped by cultural evolution to have pathogen-neutralizing properties. The second, which is an intergroup account, holds that these same relationships are based on motivations to avoid contact with outgroups, who might pose greater infectious disease threats than ingroup members. Results from a study surveying 11,501 participants across 30 nations are more consistent with the intragroup account than with the intergroup account. National parasite stress relates to traditionalism (an aspect of conservatism especially related to adherence to group norms) but not to social dominance orientation (SDO; an aspect of conservatism especially related to endorsements of intergroup barriers and negativity toward ethnic and racial outgroups). Further, individual differences in pathogen-avoidance motives (i.e., disgust sensitivity) relate more strongly to traditionalism than to SDO within the 30 nations.

Indexed as

IndividualityModels, PsychologicalPoliticsAdultAnimalsAttitudeCommunicable DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleParasitesSocial DominanceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultculturedisgustevolutionary psychologypathogenspolitical ideology

Identifiers

PMID27791090
PMCPMC5098626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.