Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791084›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Wildfire, climate, and invasive grass interactions negatively impact an indicator species by reshaping sagebrush ecosystems.

Peter S Coates, Mark A Ricca, Brian G Prochazka, Matthew L Brooks, Kevin E Doherty, Travis Kroger, Erik J Blomberg, Christian A Hagen, Michael L Casazza

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tracking spatial regimes as an early warning for a species of conservation concern.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter S CoatesUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA 95620; pcoates@usgs.gov.
Mark A RiccaUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA 95620.
Brian G ProchazkaUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA 95620.
Matthew L BrooksUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Yosemite Field Station, Oakhurst, CA 93644.
Kevin E DohertyUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood, CO 80228.
Travis KrogerUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA 95620.
Erik J BlombergDepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5775.
Christian A HagenDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97731.
Michael L CasazzaUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA 95620.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iconic sagebrush ecosystems of the American West are threatened by larger and more frequent wildfires that can kill sagebrush and facilitate invasion by annual grasses, creating a cycle that alters sagebrush ecosystem recovery post disturbance. Thwarting this accelerated grass-fire cycle is at the forefront of current national conservation efforts, yet its impacts on wildlife populations inhabiting these ecosystems have not been quantified rigorously. Within a Bayesian framework, we modeled 30 y of wildfire and climatic effects on population rates of change of a sagebrush-obligate species, the greater sage-grouse, across the Great Basin of western North America. Importantly, our modeling also accounted for variation in sagebrush recovery time post fire as determined by underlying soil properties that influence ecosystem resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasion. Our results demonstrate that the cumulative loss of sagebrush to direct and indirect effects of wildfire has contributed strongly to declining sage-grouse populations over the past 30 y at large spatial scales. Moreover, long-lasting effects from wildfire nullified pulses of sage-grouse population growth that typically follow years of higher precipitation. If wildfire trends continue unabated, model projections indicate sage-grouse populations will be reduced to 43% of their current numbers over the next three decades. Our results provide a timely example of how altered fire regimes are disrupting recovery of sagebrush ecosystems and leading to substantial declines of a widespread indicator species. Accordingly, we present scenario-based stochastic projections to inform conservation actions that may help offset the adverse effects of wildfire on sage-grouse and other wildlife populations.

Indexed as

alternate ecosystem statecheatgrassresilienceresistancesage-grouse

Identifiers

PMID27791084
PMCPMC5111658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.