ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016
Wildfire, climate, and invasive grass interactions negatively impact an indicator species by reshaping sagebrush ecosystems.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precipitation timing mediates life-stage and population-level associations with climate for an indicator species.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Linking resource selection to population performance spatially to identify species' habitat across broad scales: An example of greater sage-grouse in a distinct population segment.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Laser-induced graphene gas sensors for environmental monitoring.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
- Wildfire immediately reduces nest and adult survival of greater sage-grouse.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effects of large-scale disturbance on animal space use: Functional responses by greater sage-grouse after megafire.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- The ties that bind the sagebrush biome: integrating genetic connectivity into range-wide conservation of greater sage-grouse.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Targeting Sagebrush (Artemisia Spp.) Restoration Following Wildfire with Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus Urophasianus) Nest Selection and Survival Models.Environmental management · 2022Article
- Greater sage-grouse respond positively to intensive post-fire restoration treatments.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Tracking spatial regimes as an early warning for a species of conservation concern.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022Article
- Acute and lagged fitness consequences for a sagebrush obligate in a post mega-wildfire landscape.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Influence of environmental change, harvest exposure, and human disturbance on population trends of greater sage-grouse.PloS one · 2021Article
- Non-native plant removal and high rainfall years promote post-fire recovery of Artemisia californica in southern California sage scrub.PloS one · 2021Article
- Harvester ant seed removal in an invaded sagebrush ecosystem: Implications for restoration.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Wildfire and the ecological niche: Diminishing habitat suitability for an indicator species within semi-arid ecosystems.Global change biology · 2020Article
- Spatially explicit models of seasonal habitat for greater sage-grouse at broad spatial scales: Informing areas for management in Nevada and northeastern California.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Seasonal drought in North America's sagebrush biome structures dynamic mesic resources for sage-grouse.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Phenology largely explains taller grass at successful nests in greater sage-grouse.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Article
- Refining the cheatgrass-fire cycle in the Great Basin: Precipitation timing and fine fuel composition predict wildfire trends.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iconic sagebrush ecosystems of the American West are threatened by larger and more frequent wildfires that can kill sagebrush and facilitate invasion by annual grasses, creating a cycle that alters sagebrush ecosystem recovery post disturbance. Thwarting this accelerated grass-fire cycle is at the forefront of current national conservation efforts, yet its impacts on wildlife populations inhabiting these ecosystems have not been quantified rigorously. Within a Bayesian framework, we modeled 30 y of wildfire and climatic effects on population rates of change of a sagebrush-obligate species, the greater sage-grouse, across the Great Basin of western North America. Importantly, our modeling also accounted for variation in sagebrush recovery time post fire as determined by underlying soil properties that influence ecosystem resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasion. Our results demonstrate that the cumulative loss of sagebrush to direct and indirect effects of wildfire has contributed strongly to declining sage-grouse populations over the past 30 y at large spatial scales. Moreover, long-lasting effects from wildfire nullified pulses of sage-grouse population growth that typically follow years of higher precipitation. If wildfire trends continue unabated, model projections indicate sage-grouse populations will be reduced to 43% of their current numbers over the next three decades. Our results provide a timely example of how altered fire regimes are disrupting recovery of sagebrush ecosystems and leading to substantial declines of a widespread indicator species. Accordingly, we present scenario-based stochastic projections to inform conservation actions that may help offset the adverse effects of wildfire on sage-grouse and other wildlife populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.