Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791079›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Geometry-induced capillary emptying.

Carlos Rascón, Andrew O Parry, Dirk G A L Aarts

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toward a complete understanding of quasi-static bubble growth and departure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Bioinspired inner microstructured tube controlled capillary rise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  4. Plant-inspired pipettes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos RascónGrupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos, Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganes, Spain; carlos.rascon@uc3m.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-0343
Andrew O ParryDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Dirk G A L AartsDepartment of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a capillary is half-filled with liquid and turned to the horizontal, the liquid may flow out of the capillary or remain in it. For lack of a better criterion, the standard assumption is that the liquid will remain in a capillary of narrow cross-section, and will flow out otherwise. Here, we present a precise mathematical criterion that determines which of the two outcomes occurs for capillaries of arbitrary cross-sectional shape, and show that the standard assumption fails for certain simple geometries, leading to very rich and counterintuitive behavior. This opens the possibility of creating very sensitive microfluidic devices that respond readily to small physical changes, for instance, by triggering the sudden displacement of fluid along a capillary without the need of any external pumping.

Indexed as

capillaritycontact anglesurface tensionYoung–Laplace equation

Identifiers

PMID27791079
PMCPMC5111693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.