Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27791061›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements.

Kevin C Dieter, Michael D Melnick, Duje Tadin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards a whole brain model of Perceptual Learning.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. An algorithmic information theory of consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin C DieterVanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240; dtadin@ur.rochester.edu kevin.dieter@vanderbilt.edu.
Michael D MelnickDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627.
Duje TadinDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627; dtadin@ur.rochester.edu kevin.dieter@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Susana Marcos · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Mechanisms and plasticity of long term visual adaptation to ocular opticsR01EY014999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GEUNYOUNG YOON · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Training in Vision ResearchT32EY007135 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEOFFREY F WOODMAN · 1994 to 2026
$5.8M
Psychophysical and neural correlates of eye dominance in human visionF32EY025514 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DIETER, KEVIN · 2016 to 2017
$55k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025514NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014999NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of attention, as well as its functional utility, are particularly prominent when selecting among multiple stimuli that compete for processing resources. However, existing studies have found that binocular rivalry-a phenomenon characterized by perceptual competition between incompatible stimuli presented to the two eyes-is only modestly influenced by selective attention. Here, we demonstrate that the relative resistance of binocular rivalry to selective modulations gradually erodes over the course of extended perceptual training that uses a demanding, feature-based attentional task. The final result was a dramatic alteration in binocular rivalry dynamics, leading to profound predominance of the trained stimulus. In some cases, trained observers saw the trained rival image nearly exclusively throughout 4-min viewing periods. This large change in binocular rivalry predominance was driven by two factors: task-independent, eye-specific changes in visual processing, as well as an enhanced ability of attention to promote predominance of the task-relevant stimulus. Notably, this strengthening of task-driven attention also exhibited eye specificity above and beyond that from observed sensory processing changes. These empirical results, along with simulations from a recently developed model of interocular suppression, reveal that stimulus predominance during binocular rivalry can be realized both through an eye-specific boost in processing of sensory information and through facilitated deployment of attention to task-relevant features in the trained eye. Our findings highlight the interplay of attention and binocular rivalry at multiple visual processing stages and reveal that sustained training can substantially alter early visual mechanisms.

Indexed as

binocular rivalryperceptual learningvisual attentionvisual plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27791061
PMCPMC5111677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.