Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27790715›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2017

The impact of resection method and patient factors on quality of life among stage IA non-small cell lung cancer surgical patients.

Rebecca M Schwartz, Rowena Yip, Raja M Flores, Ingram Olkin, Emanuela Taioli, Claudia Henschke, I-ELCAP Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04805723 (Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy Surgery and Thoracotomy on Cardiorespiratory Parameters in Patients With Pulmonary Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04805723 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy Surgery and Thoracotomy on Cardiorespiratory Parameters in Patients With Pulmonary Nodules

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled27ConditionsPulmonary NoduleArmsVATS, Thoracotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca M SchwartzDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology and Prevention (OMEP), Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Great Neck, New York.
Rowena YipDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Raja M FloresDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ingram OlkinDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Emanuela TaioliPopulation Health Science and Policy Department and Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Claudia HenschkeDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
I-ELCAP Investigators
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USHofstra University · USStanford University · US

Funding

THE TISCH CANCER INSTITUTE - CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA196521 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Deanna L Benson · 2015 to 2026
$35.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA196521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGiven the increased number of treatment options for stage IA lung cancer patients, there is a growing body of literature that focuses on comparing each option's relative impact on quality of life (QoL). The current study seeks to further understand the differences in these patients' QoL according to surgical approach.

methodsScreening-diagnosed first primary pathologic stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer surgical patients from the I-ELCAP cohort who answered a baseline and 1-year follow-up QoL questionnaire (SF-12) were included in the analysis. Thoracotomy patients (N = 85) were compared with VATS patients (N = 15) using paired t-tests and analysis of variance tests.

resultsMultivariate analyses indicated no differences in QoL change between the two groups from pre- to post-surgery. Physical and emotional role functioning significantly improved among VATS patients and worsened among thoracotomy patients. Among thoracotomy patients, a significant decrease in post-surgical physical QoL was observed only in those who underwent lobectomy (-3.3; 95% CI: -5.1,-1.5), not limited resection.

conclusionsAlthough the sample size is small, preliminary findings underscore that changes in overall QoL are similar in VATS and thoracotomy stage IA lung cancer patients. Extension of the resection may be a more relevant factor on QoL post-surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:173-180. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPneumonectomySurveys and QuestionnairesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedThoracotomyTreatment Outcomelimited resectionlobectomythoracotomyVATS

Identifiers

PMID27790715
PMCPMC5996390
OpenAlexW2540797240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.