ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2016
Neurocomputational Models of Interval and Pattern Timing.
Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time, space, memory and brain-body rhythms.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Computational modeling of rhythmic expectations: Perspectives, pitfalls, and prospects.PLoS computational biology · 2025Review
- Signatures of time interval reproduction in the human electroencephalogram (EEG).Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Influences of temporal order in temporal reproduction.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Keep your finger on the pulse: Better rate perception and gap detection with vibrotactile compared to visual stimuli.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Article
- Neural population clocks: Encoding time in dynamic patterns of neural activity.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Systematic errors in the perception of rhythm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Mediodorsal Thalamus Contributes to the Timing of Instrumental Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Temporal-Sequential Learning With a Brain-Inspired Spiking Neural Network and Its Application to Musical Memory.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- A neuromechanistic model for rhythmic beat generation.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Activity in perceptual classification networks as a basis for human subjective time perception.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Predicting change: Approximate inference under explicit representation of temporal structure in changing environments.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- A model of temporal scaling correctly predicts that motor timing improves with speed.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Temporal Processing in Audition: Insights from Music.Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Review
- Encoding Time in Feedforward Trajectories of a Recurrent Neural Network Model.Neural computation · 2018Article
- Short-term depression and transient memory in sensory cortex.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- The Persistence of Memory: How the Brain Encodes Time in Memory.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most of the computations and tasks performed by the brain require the ability to tell time, and process and generate temporal patterns. Thus, there is a diverse set of neural mechanisms in place to allow the brain to tell time across a wide range of scales: from interaural delays on the order of microseconds to circadian rhythms and beyond. Temporal processing is most sophisticated on the scale of tens of milliseconds to a few seconds, because it is within this range that the brain must recognize and produce complex temporal patterns-such as those that characterize speech and music. Most models of timing, however, have focused primarily on simple intervals and durations, thus it is not clear whether they will generalize to complex pattern-based temporal tasks. Here, we review neurobiologically based models of timing in the subsecond range, focusing on whether they generalize to tasks that require placing consecutive intervals in the context of an overall pattern, that is,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.