ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016
Cytogenetic Analysis for Suspected Chromosomal Abnormalities; A Five Years Experience.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fetal genetic factors in pregnancy loss: Insights from a meta-analysis and effectiveness of whole exome sequencing.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Spectrum of constitutional chromosomal disorders: A five-year retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center in Karachi.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Frequency and Distribution of Incidental Chromosomal Abnormalities Detected by Peripheral Blood Karyotyping: A Retrospective Study.Genetics research · 2026Article
- Molecular cytogenetic analysis of multi-miscarriage products of conception in clinical cases from Al-Anbar Governorate, west of Iraq.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities in the postnatal cohort: A single-center study on 14,242 patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- Prevalence and patterns of chromosomal abnormalities in patients suspected of genetic disorders: insights from a study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
- The prevalence and patterns of chromosome abnormalities in newborns with major congenital anomalies: A retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2021Article
- Observational
- The pattern of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent miscarriages: a single center retrospective study.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
- Cytogenetic investigation of couples with recurrent spontaneous miscarriages.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChromosomal abnormalities are the results of alterations in the number or structure of chromosomes causing significant human morbidity and mortality. They are responsible for a large proportion of miscarriages, developmental delay, disorders of sexual development, congenital malformations and mental retardation.
aimThe aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of different chromosomal abnormalities in North Indian patients referred for cytogenetic analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsTotal of 859 patients ranging from newborn to 37 years of age were referred to the division of genetics, Department of Paediatrics between 2010 and 2015, with a variety of clinical disorders; Down syndrome (DS), Turner's syndrome (TS) and Klinefelter syndrome; amenorrhea; ambiguous sex and multiple congenital malformations. Chromosomal analysis was performed on lymphocyte culture according to standard methods.
resultsOf the 859 cases studied, 371 (43.1%) had chromosomal abnormalities. The most common autosomal abnormalities were DS 302 (81.4%) and sex chromosomal abnormalities were TS 51 (13.7%). Numerical abnormalities were accounted for 353 (41.0%) and structural abnormalities 18 (2.0%), respectively. Various other chromosomal anomalies were also reported.
conclusionWe have reviewed the incidence and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities and found higher rate of chromosomal abnormalities 43.1% in the referred cases. Our data suggest that chromosomal analysis is important tool in the evaluation of genetic disorders and helps clinicians to provide accurate diagnosis and proper genetic counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.